| 360 网络安全响应中心 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4d42b2e96c478df11ac597898d1526f0 | 2024-04-17 11:18:19 | 2024-04 补丁日: Oracle多个产品漏洞安全风险通告 | 详情 | |
| 448cfa0216a0757ec96f5862f86eafd4 | 2024-04-01 10:42:50 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-25 第13周 | 详情 | |
| 1205680821e2717a58c599f99a9fb422 | 2024-03-26 07:23:13 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-18 第12周 | 详情 | |
| 2e93df858fc2c5b287883dc9313a87fc | 2024-03-18 07:07:47 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-11 第11周 | 详情 | |
| c1cad147c12a38c089cd941022bc395e | 2024-03-13 04:34:11 | 2024-03 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 | |
| 7119e349c423ea015d6f2a824c67ed63 | 2024-03-11 06:17:28 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-04 第10周 | 详情 | |
| b2c0e23dcf540c0b5d2bb144ceade98d | CVE-2024-27198 | 2024-03-06 08:44:35 | CVE-2024-27198:JetBrains TeamCity 身份验证绕过漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 5e103cbd4bae3244e692ba33c1d7fcf8 | 2024-03-04 07:07:59 | 安全事件周报 2024-02-26 第9周 | 详情 | |
| cab02a763bf285b3dc009731f40f8c29 | CVE-2024-25065 | 2024-03-01 09:06:25 | CVE-2024-25065:Apache OFBiz目录遍历漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 194761e30d263596338cc998ac88cbaa | 2024-02-28 08:51:55 | SupermanMiner挖矿木马新变种持续活跃 | 详情 | |
| 213a4c5c76a220c24da1c38c605fcc10 | CVE-2024-25600 | 2024-02-27 09:55:55 | CVE-2024-25600:WordPress Bricks Builder远程命令执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| bc2c3923f651854c68f2dd6f99d69f0a | 2024-02-26 03:00:09 | 安全事件周报 2024-02-19 第8周 | 详情 | |
| 55c72f6f2af616fbddbb643df06c3b3a | CVE-2024-21413 | 2024-02-23 06:57:46 | CVE-2024-21413:Microsoft Outlook 远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f000a20bfa53fd8b0f5231b52ff34577 | 2024-02-19 10:10:13 | 2024-02 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 | |
| 48ff3925c0cc22862b0d6e1f52140bdc | 2024-02-06 07:10:07 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-29 第5周 | 详情 | |
| d8c34853fbcc6b39ae0a3783c6fa6d44 | CVE-2024-21626 | 2024-02-01 08:38:56 | CVE-2024-21626:runc容器逃逸漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 6ff357e8344fde5ea96c964cc0161137 | 2024-01-29 10:02:54 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-22 第4周 | 详情 | |
| 8fc558ad63c1387fb3ed919bf754820e | CVE-2024-0204 | 2024-01-25 08:26:39 | CVE-2024-0204:GoAnywhere MFT 身份认证绕过漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f4359caac3c70e9141439aa773e1e8a5 | 2024-01-22 11:39:38 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-15 第3周 | 详情 | |
| 4939f25b3f3d3242726cd400c645be04 | CVE-2024-0519 | 2024-01-17 09:08:07 | CVE-2024-0519:Google Chrome V8越界访问漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 300687d61adecf75afb4de6d78398518 | CVE-2024-0519 | 2024-01-17 08:09:14 | CVE-2024-0519:Google Chrome V8类型混淆漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 28f74976e64bebdcd2b71df42f44817e | CVE-2023-22527 | 2024-01-16 09:50:35 | CVE-2023-22527:Atlassian Confluence 远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| ec39eae21390157f92422897b04aad66 | 2024-01-15 08:28:24 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-08 第2周 | 详情 | |
| de12aee5eaff6382190430b22e2c643f | 2024-01-11 10:55:37 | 2024-01 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 | |
| c2b35c67c2732343be5c23579ebcdd04 | 2024-01-08 07:37:47 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-01 第1周 | 详情 | |
| 666a3a36b86650d472f7203220b3a4f5 | 2024-01-02 09:34:01 | 安全事件周报 2023-12-25 第52周 | 详情 | |
| f91862c02f62f7f8e9d01e209e59487b | CVE-2023-51467 | 2023-12-27 08:57:10 | CVE-2023-51467:Apache OFBiz 未授权远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 0c520d1f3614bc8cba4450fee6f03f5d | 2023-12-25 08:21:40 | 安全事件周报 2023-12-18 第51周 | 详情 | |
| ffb5d5f9ba0fa1576f9bd8325a8d3e66 | 2023-12-18 08:50:39 | 安全事件周报 2023-12-11 第50周 | 详情 | |
| 382c73d6388430b9cea6072c6c61858e | 2023-12-13 08:50:10 | 2023-12 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 |
| Tenable (Nessus) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1cdade67888302ecd10cba73887cf792 | CVE-2026-8166 | 2026-08-06 12:16:28 ![]() |
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Logo Software Industry and Trade Inc. E-Logo Purchasing Portal allows Stored XSS. This issue affects e-Logo Purchasing Portal: before 1.52. | 详情 |
| 0683527c58c87a3fff75f0054b95013c | CVE-2026-68481 | 2026-08-06 12:16:28 ![]() |
In Apache CXF's DefaultEncryptingOAuthDataProvider, revoked access tokens still decrypt successfully, and TokenIntrospectionService reports active:true. The same applies to refresh tokens. This violates the RFC stipulations that 'The authorization server MUST invalidate the token.' and 'introspection of a revoked token MUST return {"active":false}'. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. | 详情 |
| 22bf96f03570d6c200427dbfc0d6dc87 | CVE-2026-68079 | 2026-08-06 12:16:28 ![]() |
In Apache CXF's DefaultEncryptingCodeDataProvider, a captured authorization code can be redeemed an unlimited number of times due to a flaw in the implementation of the removeCodeGrant functionality. This violates the RFC requirement that "The authorization code MUST NOT be used more than once." Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. | 详情 |
| b01e497f0fcd1f41a18e97cbfe71e62d | CVE-2026-65583 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
Apache CXF’s OIDC relying-party token validation could accept self-issued ID tokens without enforcing required claim checks (issuer/subject/audience/time and sub_jwk binding), enabling authentication bypass with crafted tokens. However, note that self-issued ID tokens are not accepted by default in the validator. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fixes this issue. | 详情 |
| f3247d1f94159e3aad546e9c401e11a8 | CVE-2026-63687 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
Apache CXF's JwtRequestCodeFilter copies all claims from a signed request JWT into the authorization parameter map without excluding security-sensitive parameters. A client that can produce a validly-signed request JWT (e.g., one whose client_secret is known or compromised) can thereby substitute the code_challenge, code_challenge_method, nonce, and state values that were set in the outer HTTP request, undermining PKCE integrity and OpenID Connect replay protection. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. | 详情 |
| 684dc83e90ce42620aee6f542aec6837 | CVE-2026-61466 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
In Apache CXF's OAuth2 Dynamic Client Registration endpoint, the authorization server accepts and stores the `scope` value supplied in the client registration request verbatim, without validating it against an AS-defined allowlist. This could lead to a client self-assigning privileged scopes at registration time. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3 or 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. | 详情 |
| f111973c241fad6acfe72662f8e5f147 | CVE-2026-57818 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
A race condition in JCacheCodeDataProvider allows an attacker to redeem a single authorization code multiple times via concurrent requests, resulting in the issuance of multiple distinct, valid access tokens. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.2.3, 4.1.8 or 3.6.12, which fix this issue. | 详情 |
| 0d8e098e391e800b3ae756f55801d97e | CVE-2026-5391 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
The LatePoint plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'btn_wrapper_classes' attribute of the 'latepoint_resources' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 5.3.2. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping in the 'locations' branch of the 'shortcode_latepoint_resources' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | 详情 |
| d1e05f22118800422f84e2cc964e4367 | CVE-2026-5158 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
The Post Grid Gutenberg Blocks for News, Magazines, Blog Websites – PostX plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'inputPlaceHolder' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.13 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | 详情 |
| d3a60adedd0f8fd32007da10b2c6b7e7 | CVE-2026-19035 | 2026-08-06 12:16:27 ![]() |
A vulnerability was identified in Shibby Tomato 1.28.0000. Affected by this issue is the function new_qoslimit_start of the file /etc/qoslimit. The manipulation of the argument new_qoslimit_enable leads to os command injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. This project is superseded by FreshTomato. | 详情 |
| 104c7601e3e21d6438445bf181877c33 | CVE-2026-71256 | 2026-08-05 12:18:57 ![]() |
nanoMODBUS through v1.23.0 contains an out-of-bounds stack read leading to a wild-pointer write in nmbs_read_device_identification_basic() / recv_read_device_identification_res() in nanomodbus.c. A fixed 3-element stack array order[3] = {0,1,2} maps object IDs to buffer indices. The server-supplied object_id field (0-255, read directly from the wire) is used without any bounds check as buf_index = order[object_id]. When a malicious Modbus server sends a Read Device Identification response with object_id >= 3, this reads an out-of-bounds/garbage byte from the stack adjacent to order[], which is then used as an index into a 3-element buffers[] array of char* pointers. The resulting wild pointer is passed to strncpy() as the destination, causing an arbitrary-address write with server-controlled data. | 详情 |
| aad2cfda5e2a80d609ec1538bbe35b9e | CVE-2026-71255 | 2026-08-05 12:18:57 ![]() |
nanoMODBUS through v1.23.0 contains an out-of-bounds write in the Modbus client-side recv_read_device_identification_res() function (FC 0x2B/MEI 0x0E, Read Device Identification) in nanomodbus.c. The server-supplied object_length field (0-246) is validated only against the remaining PDU size (res_size_left) and is never validated against the caller-supplied buffers_length parameter. After copying data with strncpy(buffers_out[buf_index], str, buffers_length), the code unconditionally writes a NUL terminator at buffers_out[buf_index][object_length]. When a malicious or compromised Modbus server sends a response with object_length greater than or equal to the client's buffers_length, this NUL write lands past the end of the caller-provided buffer, corrupting adjacent stack or heap memory on the client. | 详情 |
| 816d25f63e2e3e85bb8cfd24c2de75fc | CVE-2026-71254 | 2026-08-05 12:18:57 ![]() |
nanoMODBUS through v1.23.0 contains an out-of-bounds write in the Modbus server-side handle_read_file_record() function (FC 0x14, Read File Record) in nanomodbus.c. The function validates that the total request size does not exceed 245 bytes and that each sub-request's record_length is at most 124, but it never validates the CUMULATIVE response size across all sub-requests before processing them. The accumulator response_data_size is declared as uint8_t and is incremented by 2 + record_length*2 for each of up to 35 sub-requests; with 35 sub-requests of record_length=124, the cumulative demand is 8750 bytes, which overflows the uint8_t accumulator. A subsequent loop then calls get_n(), an internal function with no bounds checking, once per sub-request to obtain a pointer into the 260-byte msg.buf receive buffer and advances the internal buf_idx by up to 248 bytes per call; swap_regs() then writes to that pointer unconditionally. A single crafted FC 0x14 request from an unauthenticated network client can cause up to ~8490 bytes to be written out of bounds past the 260-byte buffer, corrupting adjacent memory in the server process and leading to denial of service or potential remote code execution, particularly on embedded/bare-metal targets without memory protection. | 详情 |
| f0c7ed6d5665af24f00dfc6dd10c5eb9 | CVE-2026-64582 | 2026-08-05 12:18:57 ![]() |
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: RDMA/rxe: Fix a use-after-free problem in rxe_mmap rxe_mmap() removes a rxe_mmap_info struct from the pending_mmaps list and releases pending_lock while the struct's kref is still at 1: list_del_init(&ip->pending_mmaps); spin_unlock_bh(&rxe->pending_lock); /* ref == 1, no lock held */ ret = remap_vmalloc_range(vma, ip->obj, 0); /* walks PTEs */ [...] rxe_vma_open(vma); /* kref_get, ref → 2 */ remap_vmalloc_range_partial() walks PTEs without any lock. A concurrent DESTROY_CQ ioctl on another CPU calls: kref_put(&q->ip->ref, rxe_mmap_release) /* ref 1→0 */ vfree(ip->obj) /* clears vmalloc PTEs mid-walk */ kfree(ip) /* frees rxe_mmap_info */ This yields: 1. Kernel crash, vmalloc_to_page() returns NULL when vfree wins the per-PTE race -> vm_insert_page(NULL) → GPF in validate_page_before_insert 2. Page UAF, vmalloc_to_page() reads a stale PTE before vfree clears it. User VMA holds a PTE to a free'd page which might eventually get reallocated later by vmalloc which allows the attacker to get a clean page-level UAF. It is worth noting that even though a page-level UAF is possible given the strong primitive, it is statistically very difficult to achieve given the very short time window (after the last insert_page and before the kref_get). The call trace are as below: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000001: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN NOPTI KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000008-0x000000000000000f] CPU: 0 UID: 1000 PID: 413 Comm: poc Not tainted 7.0.0-rc5-dirty #28 PREEMPT(lazy) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:validate_page_before_insert+0x32/0x300 Code: e5 41 57 41 56 49 89 fe 41 55 41 54 53 48 89 f3 e8 93 b5 a3 ff 48 8d 7b 08 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 7b 02 00 00 4c 8b 63 08 31 ff 4d 89 e5 41 83 e5 RSP: 0018:ffff88811b15f2f0 EFLAGS: 00000202 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000008 RBP: ffff88811b15f318 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8881181eee00 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff8881181eee00 R15: ffff8881181eee20 FS: 00007b1e000f76c0(0000) GS:ffff8884268e0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007b1e00a24ac0 CR3: 0000000116eb3000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 Call Trace: |
详情 |
| 3e4e84fdf761732b8945fa0cc4afd89a | CVE-2026-61891 | 2026-08-05 12:18:57 ![]() |
In Eclipse Theia versions up to and including 1.73.1, the `@theia/filesystem` backend exposes HTTP file-download endpoints (`GET /file`, `GET /files/`, `PUT /files/`) that convert a client-supplied URI directly to a filesystem path and stream the file, without confining it to the workspace or any allow-listed root. In browser (non-Electron) deployments the connection token is enforced only on WebSocket upgrades; the HTTP middleware in `@theia/core` re-issues the cookie and calls `next()` without rejecting tokenless HTTP requests, so these endpoints are reachable without a valid token. As a result an unauthenticated client can read any file readable by the backend process, including files outside the opened workspace (for example `/etc/hosts`, SSH keys, or tokens). Electron mode uses a separate `ElectronSecurityToken` and is not affected via this path. | 详情 |
| 69505567abc2e2f8856ce4fb1661c206 | CVE-2026-46581 | 2026-08-05 12:18:57 ![]() |
In Eclipse Mojarra versions 2.3 and following, URL handing in `DefaultFaceletFactory` does not properly sanitize and/or block remote URLs, allowing an attacker to specify a URL to a remote Facelet which will be included and processed as part of the normal request, with the privileges of the target server. This could allow access to restricted files such as `WEB-INF/web.xml` or `/etc/passwd`. | 详情 |
| 3e4fb94edae29259e1879bcd1ea4006d | CVE-2026-18933 | 2026-08-05 12:18:56 ![]() |
The wp-downloadmanager WordPress plugin, in version 1.68.11 (also affecting the 6.9.4 release line), allows an admin-privileged user (current_user_can('manage_downloads')) to upload arbitrary files via download-add.php with no extension or MIME-type validation of any kind - no wp_check_filetype_and_ext(), no validate_file(), and no extension blocklist exist anywhere in the upload handler. The destination path is additionally built by concatenating the raw, unsanitized $_POST['file_upload_to'] value with no traversal check (no ../ filtering, no basename()/realpath() applied). Since the base download path is required to live under WP_CONTENT_DIR (a web-accessible location), an uploaded PHP file lands in a web-servable path and can be directly executed, resulting in remote code execution. The plugin's own later changelog confirms these protections were absent in this version: v1.69 added file-type validation via wp_check_filetype_and_ext(), and v1.69.1 added directory-traversal protection - neither existed in 1.68.11. | 详情 |
| 7f5d6b043b17084c1f9f683747acc9a9 | CVE-2026-71252 | 2026-08-05 11:16:28 ![]() |
toner-management's admin state-changing handlers (add.php, edit.php, delete.php under admin/toners, admin/toner-brands, admin/printers, and related admin subdirectories) executed INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE database operations with no authentication or authorization check, while access control was enforced only in listing views. An unauthenticated remote attacker could invoke these handlers directly to create, modify, or destroy application data. The vendor has since merged a fix requiring an authenticated admin session before any such handler proceeds. | 详情 |
| d086ff9c8df3439af3638fe2d66c86a2 | CVE-2026-71251 | 2026-08-05 11:16:28 ![]() |
Akaunting's shared download route (app/Http/Controllers/Common/Uploads.php::download(), reachable at uploads/{id}/download behind only generic auth middleware) fetched the requested Media record by ID with no verification that it belonged to the requesting portal customer's own company, allowing any authenticated portal customer to download any other company's uploaded files by guessing or enumerating media IDs. Fixed in commit 80ef6d3 (2026-07-12), which added an explicit ownership check comparing the media's parent record contact_id against the requesting user's own contact. | 详情 |
| 0f2586970c6a915c644045dccbae6743 | CVE-2026-71250 | 2026-08-05 11:16:28 ![]() |
Firefly III's webhook URL validator (IsValidWebhookUrl.php) filters most private/reserved IPv4 ranges but contains an explicit early-return that allows any resolved address in 127.0.0.0/8, permitting an authenticated user (with webhooks enabled, which is off by default) to configure a webhook targeting loopback services on the server. Additionally, the validator resolves the target hostname once via gethostbyname() at validation time, but the actual outbound request (StandardWebhookSender.php, via Guzzle) re-resolves the hostname independently at send time, allowing a DNS-rebinding attacker to pass validation against a public IP and have the real request delivered to a private or internal address. The webhook response body is only written to a server-side debug log, not returned to the triggering user, so this is a blind SSRF primitive rather than one with direct response read-back. | 详情 |
| a4c72d4ddc683319fb87c5cae82b5ffc | CVE-2026-66884 | 2026-08-04 12:16:36 | Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback module) allows an attacker to make a victim's browser complete an authorization flow the victim never initiated. This vulnerability is associated with program file lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex and program routine Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2. A callback request that carries no Oidcc.Plug.Authorize session is processed with every security check disabled rather than being rejected. call/2 substitutes permissive defaults for the absent session, and each downstream check treats its value as nothing to compare and returns :ok, so the nonce, state, PKCE, peer IP and user agent checks are all skipped. A separate clause of check_state/2 also accepts a state-less request when a verifier is present. An attacker obtains an authorization code for their own provider account, then induces the victim to visit the callback endpoint with that code and no state parameter. The application signs the victim in as the attacker, so the victim's subsequent actions occur in the attacker's account where the attacker can read them. Applications reusing one callback for both signing in and linking a provider account are further exposed to account takeover, the attacker's account becoming linked to the victim's. The permissive fallback serves no conforming flow. Third-party-initiated login reaches a relying party at a separate login initiation endpoint and causes it to send a fresh authentication request, and this library implements no such endpoint. Oidcc.Plug.Authorize always sends a state parameter, which an authorization server must echo, so no legitimate callback lacks one. This issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.2.0-beta.1 before 0.5.0. | 详情 |
| a64ccd01bb05b5e017fdf282a56bffda | CVE-2026-66883 | 2026-08-04 12:16:36 | Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang Ecosystem Foundation oidcc_plug (Oidcc.Plug.Authorize module) renders the user agent session binding inert, removing a defense in depth control against replay of a stolen session. This vulnerability is associated with program files lib/oidcc/plug/authorize.ex and lib/oidcc/plug/authorization_callback.ex, and program routines Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 and Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback.call/2. Oidcc.Plug.Authorize.call/2 reads the initiating client's user agent with get_req_header(conn, "User-Agent"). Plug lowercases incoming header names, but get_req_header/2 matches the supplied key exactly and performs no normalization of its own, so the mixed-case lookup always returns an empty list and nil is written into the session. On the callback side, Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback treats a stored nil user agent as nothing to compare and returns :ok without inspecting the request. The two behaviours combine so that the check passes unconditionally on every request, including for deployments that explicitly opted in with check_useragent: true, and an authorization callback can be completed from a different user agent than the one that initiated the flow without detection. The check fails open silently, with no error and no log entry, so a deployment cannot tell the binding is absent. The impact is limited to defense in depth. The inert check does not by itself allow an attacker to complete an authorization flow; it removes one layer that would otherwise hinder use of a stolen or leaked session, such as an exfiltrated session cookie replayed from a different client. The CSRF/state, nonce, and PKCE checks are unaffected and continue to function. Deployments that never enabled check_useragent are not affected in practice, since they never expected the binding. The corresponding lookup in Oidcc.Plug.AuthorizationCallback correctly uses the lowercase key and is not affected. This issue affects oidcc_plug: from 0.1.0-alpha.3 before 0.5.0. | 详情 |
| b9be65c707a6c21a7e1c9e7f916fe379 | CVE-2026-10050 | 2026-08-04 11:22:43 | In Eclipse Jetty, the Digest authentication server-side component uses ISO-8859-1 to encode the password as bytes. This was done because the initial specification for HTTP did not specify explicitly a charset, and it was assumed to be ISO-8859-1 for historical reasons. If the password contains characters that cannot be represented in ISO-8859-1, they are silently replaced by `?`. This happens with passwords that contain Chinese, Cyrillic or Greek characters, for example: `αβ123` converts to `??123`. An attacker can send a request with a digest `Authorization` header crafted with a password made of only `?` characters; the server would match any password of the same length that contains non-ISO-8859-1 characters. Recent HTTP Digest [RFC-7616](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc7616) supports a `charset` parameters that defaults to UTF-8 that allows for correct encoding/decoding of passwords. | 详情 |
| e810f892f70eafa0bf3ae46899264e3b | CVE-2026-18772 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | Improper input validation vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Oversized Serialized Data Payloads. | 详情 |
| e7a753f5acf36b83a8c1c1efebe331c6 | CVE-2026-15721 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | Cleartext storage of sensitive information vulnerability in Bilin Software and Informatics Consultancy Inc. HUMANIST Digital Human Resources allows SQL Injection. This issue affects HUMANIST Digital Human Resources: from 26.0 before 26.1. | 详情 |
| c60ad35a774c74882671235fa3e73b42 | CVE-2026-14838 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | Use of GET request method with sensitive query strings vulnerability in Bilin Software and Informatics Consultancy Inc. HUMANIST Digital Human Resources allows Session Hijacking. This issue affects HUMANIST Digital Human Resources: from 26.0 before 26.1. | 详情 |
| b7ef51e0978aa832a51e746830fdb518 | CVE-2026-14804 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | Use of hard-coded cryptographic key vulnerability in Bilin Software and Informatics Consultancy Inc. HUMANIST Digital Human Resources allows Read Sensitive Constants Within an Executable. This issue affects HUMANIST Digital Human Resources: from 26.0 before 26.1. | 详情 |
| af742771e0cd9dc5c8f2b9f2c6f4a664 | CVE-2026-14465 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | Insufficient session expiration vulnerability in Bilin Software and Informatics Consultancy Inc. HUMANIST Digital Human Resources allows Reusing Session IDs (aka Session Replay). This issue affects HUMANIST Digital Human Resources: from 26.0 before 26.1. | 详情 |
| 1618e9671b619ce5972392d80630eca0 | CVE-2026-14219 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | URL redirection to untrusted site ('open redirect') vulnerability in Bilin Software and Informatics Consultancy Inc. HUMANIST Digital Human Resources allows Phishing. This issue affects HUMANIST Digital Human Resources: from 26.0 before 26.1. | 详情 |
| 02e1b5c96464f65bf31dbea25c7f53a8 | CVE-2026-14202 | 2026-08-04 10:19:32 | Observable response discrepancy vulnerability in Bilin Software and Informatics Consultancy Inc. HUMANIST Digital Human Resources allows Account Footprinting. This issue affects HUMANIST Digital Human Resources: from 26.0 before 26.1. | 详情 |
| 国家信息安全漏洞共享平台(CNVD) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8686fda9b2b49e4e1666b54e2248f935 | CNVD-2021-74882 | 2021-11-14 16:43:52 | 四创科技有限公司建站系统存在SQL注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8f6972d84ad188b05ff9cc14d4334949 | CNVD-2021-87021 (CVE-2020-4690) | 2021-11-12 12:43:14 | IBM Security Guardium硬编码凭证漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3bfe7b053a0c59d8a3d38c18f86aa143 | CNVD-2021-87022 (CVE-2021-38870) | 2021-11-12 12:43:12 | IBM Aspera跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| a4649bb17f4db4d1c7f879ebceb46ed0 | CNVD-2021-87011 (CVE-2021-29753) | 2021-11-12 12:43:11 | IBM Business Automation Workflow存在未明漏洞 | 详情 |
| 094c613f9ed4b8b9d887dc912789043c | CNVD-2021-87025 (CVE-2021-20563) | 2021-11-12 12:43:10 | IBM Sterling File Gateway信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 41c47f01a4c65dcb6efc9ebf483fe762 | CNVD-2021-87010 (CVE-2021-38887) | 2021-11-12 12:43:08 | IBM InfoSphere Information Server信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| f51d33e7a09fd61ca90ede453515a830 | CNVD-2021-87016 (CVE-2021-29764) | 2021-11-12 12:43:07 | IBM Sterling B2B Integrator跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 33615a5f78df822e82e6d3436045c48c | CNVD-2021-87026 (CVE-2021-38877) | 2021-11-12 12:43:06 | IBM Jazz for Service Management跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8e729177bcb4105dd831fb1e123ed1bb | CNVD-2021-87014 (CVE-2021-29679) | 2021-11-12 12:43:04 | IBM Cognos Analytics远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1a3b856f78e9fbdca12aeddc7d665aca | CNVD-2021-87029 (CVE-2021-29752) | 2021-11-12 12:43:03 | IBM Db2信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6f1aa3a0cb819d97519baa47fd0232d5 | CNVD-2021-87015 (CVE-2021-29745) | 2021-11-12 12:43:02 | IBM Cognos Analytics权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| cbcb12f5f51d6e7d6d8a9fa581aa863a | CNVD-2021-73908 | 2021-11-11 16:42:44 | 泛微e-cology存在SQL注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| ae6fd467da55de31aa7219187cf5c2d4 | CNVD-2021-86904 (CVE-2021-20351) | 2021-11-11 08:31:46 | IBM Engineering跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 412a15b40959ed9cf9330ee79f99e079 | CNVD-2021-86903 (CVE-2021-31173) | 2021-11-11 08:31:44 | Microsoft SharePoint Server信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1cbc5d5faac431d3e82c9e5ea9588b5f | CNVD-2021-86902 (CVE-2021-31172) | 2021-11-11 08:31:43 | Microsoft SharePoint欺骗漏洞 | 详情 |
| 686c7cfb20933b41c3d679cbba79a2ad | CNVD-2021-86901 (CVE-2021-31181) | 2021-11-11 08:31:42 | Microsoft SharePoint远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72fdfb2d44c0d41d638e4632bdfc10b8 | CNVD-2021-86900 (CVE-2021-3561) | 2021-11-11 08:31:41 | fig2dev缓冲区溢出漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3ba6f0e9394f9414e2cadb9495e2d5f5 | CNVD-2021-85884 (CVE-2021-41210) | 2021-11-10 07:24:57 | Google TensorFlow堆分配数组越界读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 4d8c4744ea972fb2fcb9673fea1fc7b7 | CNVD-2021-85883 (CVE-2021-41226) | 2021-11-10 07:24:56 | Google TensorFlow堆越界访问漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8778f9cd924cae585ca5e2e0b8be3b3f | CNVD-2021-85882 (CVE-2021-41224) | 2021-11-10 07:24:54 | Google TensorFlow堆越界访问漏洞 | 详情 |
| e1b2722e6d5c509c680b584416d9cb20 | CNVD-2021-85881 (CVE-2021-42770) | 2021-11-10 07:24:53 | OPNsense跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| ed09c9fa5586e2d4d9b4e95fe3b447a0 | CNVD-2021-85880 (CVE-2021-28024) | 2021-11-10 07:24:52 | ServiceTonic访问控制不当漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8a642f0922f7f915e81b2b947276a96c | CNVD-2021-85879 (CVE-2021-28023) | 2021-11-10 07:24:50 | ServiceTonic任意文件上传漏洞 | 详情 |
| c00b061c2cfdee4016a869a188135db5 | CNVD-2021-85878 (CVE-2021-28022) | 2021-11-10 07:24:49 | ServiceTonic SQL注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 9c4b20a28ad2bd4ab916448f0e1272bd | CNVD-2021-85877 (CVE-2021-32483) | 2021-11-10 07:24:48 | Cloudera Manager不正确访问控制漏洞 | 详情 |
| 4d4423857b7b1f38e49738f00e8949ba | CNVD-2021-85876 (CVE-2021-32481) | 2021-11-10 07:24:46 | Cloudera Hue跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6b12b7fc216d603e8e07351603851c86 | CNVD-2021-85875 (CVE-2021-29994) | 2021-11-10 07:24:45 | Cloudera Hue跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72894fb3a3538de240d2f6810aae63c9 | CNVD-2021-85892 (CVE-2021-42701) | 2021-11-10 02:38:27 | DAQFactory中间人攻击漏洞 | 详情 |
| 94a1f99a64ba24540cc1594d0a0b3152 | CNVD-2021-85893 (CVE-2021-42699) | 2021-11-10 02:38:26 | DAQFactory明文传输漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5d9bac33be8f2f88391f6de02fb89c73 | CNVD-2021-85894 (CVE-2021-42698) | 2021-11-10 02:38:24 | DAQFactory反序列化漏洞 | 详情 |
| 国家信息安全漏洞库(CNNVD) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b5815af17792cf5abac5732bae3094e9 | CNNVD-202308-131 (CVE-2023-20215) | 2023-08-03 12:41:47 | Cisco Secure Web Appliance 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8d98bb094a70919c9e881cc7da5898d4 | CNNVD-202308-132 (CVE-2023-20204) | 2023-08-03 12:40:44 | Cisco BroadWorks CommPilot 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| c65e18d821cb73d6036dc2df6a726951 | CNNVD-202308-123 (CVE-2023-29409) | 2023-08-02 12:45:03 | Google Golang 资源管理错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 452c53b54ef3a658eaf6bd8e7d93fe05 | CNNVD-202308-124 (CVE-2023-4070) | 2023-08-02 12:44:01 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| ac7b17414d163c2f26008516638e3a99 | CNNVD-202308-125 (CVE-2023-39113) | 2023-08-02 12:42:59 | ngiflib 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 224fd467b813dbee234efe1e61e2ec66 | CNNVD-202308-126 (CVE-2023-39114) | 2023-08-02 12:42:57 | ngiflib 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72d862f454eb3d0e4dd221413d85f6b2 | CNNVD-202308-127 (CVE-2023-1437) | 2023-08-02 12:42:55 | Advantech WebAccess/SCADA 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| a3b636c53a2116b7ab85ea0c29470e76 | CNNVD-202308-128 (CVE-2023-3329) | 2023-08-02 12:42:53 | SpiderControl SCADA Webserver 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| 0e8e3c3600e145e70920c2026bde8feb | CNNVD-202308-129 (CVE-2023-4069) | 2023-08-02 12:42:51 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 619ce483843859fb783525b2b8d00f59 | CNNVD-202308-130 (CVE-2023-4068) | 2023-08-02 12:41:48 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6a73381eaa628503bd8c242cd313f005 | CNNVD-202308-057 (CVE-2023-36121) | 2023-08-01 12:48:12 | e107 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 086c171bc44677f87e0ad45c8ab5dab6 | CNNVD-202308-058 (CVE-2023-2164) | 2023-08-01 12:47:10 | GitLab 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| bc6915cfb72ce7e27f2aa64ff3a35ee2 | CNNVD-202308-059 (CVE-2023-31432) | 2023-08-01 12:47:08 | Brocade Fabric OS 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 915090fa2939ee9d9978125be4eeff27 | CNNVD-202308-060 (CVE-2023-3739) | 2023-08-01 12:46:07 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| b790441bc923d37c914ea50edcdfaa16 | CNNVD-202308-061 (CVE-2023-3385) | 2023-08-01 12:46:05 | GitLab 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| a6be4479387eddda68e1c7808965c1bc | CNNVD-202308-062 (CVE-2022-40609) | 2023-08-01 12:46:03 | IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 55409ee74ffe87168f7d61814b568334 | CNNVD-202308-063 (CVE-2023-31431) | 2023-08-01 12:46:02 | Brocade Fabric OS 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| a4340da9d26800c671fa800a080c3d01 | CNNVD-202308-064 (CVE-2023-36210) | 2023-08-01 12:45:00 | MotoCMS 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| d70ae2187ae1aa50a2af6befce15bfbd | CNNVD-202308-065 (CVE-2023-31428) | 2023-08-01 12:43:58 | Brocade Fabric OS 代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8b0e98f117732e813318bdec77d0fb4b | CNNVD-202308-066 (CVE-2023-31928) | 2023-08-01 12:42:57 | Brocade Fabric OS 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 73ffd9540daad0a04d3d54041ba9df14 | CNNVD-202307-2321 (CVE-2023-37772) | 2023-07-31 12:44:10 | Online Shopping Portal 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 10f462bbd81ee431ab32c6a160fc068d | CNNVD-202307-2322 (CVE-2023-3983) | 2023-07-31 12:44:08 | Advantech iView 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 91dcd4420b85064dbae045bceabb71b9 | CNNVD-202307-2323 (CVE-2023-37496) | 2023-07-31 12:44:07 | HCL Technologies HCL Verse 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| c81e50233ec479272b638b8dbddedeea | CNNVD-202307-2324 (CVE-2023-38989) | 2023-07-31 12:44:05 | jeesite 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 775849c6f8c5fe41588806137e12cfa8 | CNNVD-202307-2326 (CVE-2023-3462) | 2023-07-31 12:44:03 | HashiCorp Vault 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| f995ebc4f6961ed50c6d18ec0f7efcf4 | CNNVD-202307-2327 (CVE-2022-42183) | 2023-07-31 12:44:01 | Precisely Spectrum Spatial Analyst 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 67539644d8b06577c03aeab1ac018450 | CNNVD-202307-2328 (CVE-2022-42182) | 2023-07-31 12:43:59 | Precisely Spectrum Spatial Analyst 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| b61f0e730dfb90bb1c6f8f6e83508ae7 | CNNVD-202307-2329 (CVE-2023-39122) | 2023-07-31 12:43:56 | BMC Control-M 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| a09d1da1d10d2b5f823d7b8b41490660 | CNNVD-202307-2330 (CVE-2023-3825) | 2023-07-31 12:42:54 | PTC Kepware KEPServerEX 资源管理错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 05caf2e95b7a0f72e0c071c443e1d82b | CNNVD-202307-2331 (CVE-2023-4033) | 2023-07-31 12:42:52 | Mlflow 操作系统命令注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 奇安信 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45ab4afdafe578698bcfccccd65d833e | yt | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0009 Microsoft Windows Type 1字体处理远程代码执行漏洞(ADV200006)通告 | 详情 | |
| 74691465618764c64d52a2ff58013ac4 | yt | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0013 Firefox远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-11707)预警通告 | 详情 | |
| 6bd01daffa85191c80698354fc8e252f | wt | QianxinTI-SV-2019-0015 Microsoft Windows RDP远程桌面服务多个远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 | |
| 59085bf4ae9a7a3802468d9764c94968 | wt | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0022 微软IE浏览器JScript脚本引擎远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 | |
| 7010355bb6ffff38cb1a885acf784ca7 | ft | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0008 Microsoft Windows SMBv3.0服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-0796)通告 | 详情 | |
| 5edb21a58a7e21692bd0ddd622d39279 | St | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0013 Microsoft DNS Server远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-1350)通告 | 详情 | |
| 3e8973410ef7c04408d63fa10c230487 | St | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0002 Microsoft IE jscript远程命令执行0day漏洞(CVE-2020-0674)通告 | 详情 | |
| e8bc02a0c3bfbafd4c84d9ec26e9bede | St | QianxinTI-SV-2020-0001 微软核心加密库漏洞(CVE-2020-0601)通告 | 详情 | |
| f749eac58b87d0954f0e4a84b5d67057 | CVE-2020-1350 | 2020-07-15 15:57:00 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0013 Microsoft DNS Server远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-1350)通告 | 详情 |
| 90b93cb7073fe73b17746ac166a09637 | CVE-2020-6819, CVE-2020-6820 | 2020-04-08 10:34:35 | QianxinTI-SV-2020-0012 Firefox在野远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-6819、CVE-2020-6820)通告 | 详情 |
| e318a5efa4803b50cdef480b90b1784d | 2020-03-25 13:58:51 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0009 Microsoft Windows Type 1字体处理远程代码执行漏洞(ADV200006)通告 | 详情 | |
| cffc3035f7899495cfeae521451f91b2 | CVE-2020-0796 | 2020-03-12 10:32:09 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0008 Microsoft Windows SMBv3.0服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-0796)通告 | 详情 |
| 3e6175d47d17c6f94bd9ba10d81c3717 | CVE-2020-0674 | 2020-03-02 14:52:46 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0002 Microsoft IE jscript远程命令执行0day漏洞(CVE-2020-0674)通告 | 详情 |
| d99d073afb7d248a8a62fb068921997f | CVE-2020-0601 | 2020-01-15 14:11:41 | QianxinTI-SV-2020-0001 微软核心加密库漏洞(CVE-2020-0601)通告 | 详情 |
| b7b45b14a3af1225ef6eec72d74964df | CVE-2019-1367 | 2019-09-25 17:23:00 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0022 微软IE浏览器JScript脚本引擎远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 504fc79f0123db109a11b149c334b75c | CVE-2019-0708 | 2019-09-09 10:20:47 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0006 微软远程桌面服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-0708)预警通告 | 详情 |
| 5b727692d583d4a6e7cdb0f670eac12a | CVE-2019-1181, CVE-2019-1182, CVE-2019-1222, CVE-2019-1226 | 2019-08-14 11:09:05 | QianxinTI-SV-2019-0015 Microsoft Windows RDP远程桌面服务多个远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 54b48d765fccbc8dcfa3de0920459f8d | CVE-2019-11707 | 2019-06-19 16:53:47 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0013 Firefox远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-11707)预警通告 | 详情 |
| 5b4d5fea09fbc2dca45be53f162d39de | CVE-2019-0708 | 2019-05-31 17:03:19 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0006 微软远程桌面服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-0708)预警通告 | 详情 |
| 安全客 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03afa8b4eaf4a0160784152fca5465b2 | CVE-2021-27308 | 2021-07-11 14:22:05 | 4images 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8b0ace4c54a7fc20a99d21e294152a99 | CVE-2020-15261 | 2021-07-11 14:22:05 | Veyon Service 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| d4f12de949590ab346b61986a29d8b4d | CVE-2021-35039 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | Linux kernel 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| f790e7ef3b5de3774d42ee32b9b10c01 | CVE-2021-34626 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | WordPress 访问控制错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 71bf261eb2113d5ff870ab9bafd29f55 | CVE-2021-25952 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | just-safe-set 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 152793cbc104933584f5f227606f433d | CVE-2021-0597 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | Google Android 信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 75f153c327984fdfdd2d9c463a91371d | CVE-2021-34430 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | Eclipse TinyDTLS 安全特征问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 9610336f1a41241cc8edea22a2780ec5 | CVE-2021-3638 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | QEMU 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 92fe450ae5c5dfa48072aca79d64ba63 | CVE-2021-34614 | 2021-07-09 14:24:32 | Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 680a4218fc32922746717210664a3d62 | CVE-2021-22144 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Elasticsearch 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 373930f669f2c1f7b61101a925304779 | CVE-2021-24022 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Fortinet FortiManager 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8556f9cd0699f88c1f6cca9a43463bdd | CVE-2021-33012 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Allen Bradley Micrologix 1100输入验证错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 480ae713cc88cc0985e1ebc079974d83 | CVE-2021-0592 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Google Android 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8ef4dbefa6604ea2312621401c3ec0b9 | CVE-2021-1598 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Cisco Video Surveillance 7000 Series IP Cameras 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| d6e8714c32df7a0dcc2f3910ec68b42d | CVE-2021-20782 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Software License Manager 跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 4e60b22611b8bb0fd7e532896498af29 | CVE-2021-20781 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | WordPress 跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5ca48ad58fb499c069ae0800c3b39875 | CVE-2021-32961 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | MDT AutoSave代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2ed854890b43f08e52340a1e8fe6d39f | CVE-2021-0577 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Google Android 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8d63110e1475bbd245715b2ee1824d13 | CVE-2021-31816 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Octopus Server 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72bef2ae2f5db7dd066e1cdefa618dc5 | CVE-2021-31817 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Octopus Server 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1f7369b2609dbd2cd40d091f7de540cd | CVE-2020-20217 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Mikrotik RouterOs 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1793176eecc5813c3348f026dc9909c9 | CVE-2020-28598 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | PrusaSlicer 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 7f4cf34ceb545548dcfcc3c0e7120268 | CVE-2021-32945 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | MDT AutoSave加密问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 58553eb00d6e3e83b633f09464c4e98a | CVE-2021-29712 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | IBM InfoSphere Information Server 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| d8e27ec42fb0b89998fcc006f49b249b | CVE-2021-25432 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Members 信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8f2adc6c247725bf2eb7f53256c93ea7 | CVE-2021-25433 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Tizen安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8f949676124339eb6f64f9c607af5470 | CVE-2021-25431 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Mobile Device Cameralyzer 访问控制错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 069818a8958f9c158fcb0956ee32fc03 | CVE-2021-25434 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Tizen 代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 55b9126220b9722ff5d730d3996877e9 | CVE-2021-32949 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | MDT AutoSave 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| ebab009fffdee3d360dcdff74b0ed061 | CVE-2021-25435 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Tizen代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 斗象 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 096b6298d82574500dc1a14c9dba4065 | CVE-2022-22038, CVE-2022-22047, CVE-2022-30216, CVE-2022-22029 | 2022-07-15 00:38:28 | 微软2022年7月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 6018f718b2d751478bf1ce069ac65f0d | CVE-2022-2185 | 2022-07-01 09:02:05 | GitLab 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-2185) | 详情 |
| 844719cf0bb4843aff73d2f33cc6dd0b | CVE-2022-30190, CVE-2022-30136 | 2022-06-15 05:48:12 | 微软2022年6月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 8b47000e1abfbacdadb7df6f09152d89 | CVE-2022-26134 | 2022-06-03 05:48:38 | Atlassian Confluence 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-26134) | 详情 |
| eebe93468b36d2ca24cf4b82136a5635 | CVE-2022-30190 | 2022-05-31 13:57:17 | Microsoft Windows MSDT 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-30190) | 详情 |
| 95525e3f5907a776dc7cd4f87f2e2154 | 2022-05-23 07:11:04 | Fastjson 反序列化漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 945fd6e612634d9721f861833f1ecb75 | CVE-2022-26925, CVE-2022-26937, CVE-2022-22017, CVE-2022-26923 | 2022-05-11 03:45:48 | 微软2022年5月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| e2938ff82d0cc152508e0240697def4c | CVE-2022-1388 | 2022-05-06 05:53:04 | F5 BIG-IP iControl REST 身份验证绕过漏洞(CVE-2022-1388) | 详情 |
| bcf7253d2ee580c618737de137d370c4 | CVE-2022-29464 | 2022-04-22 02:21:17 | WSO2 Carbon Server 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-29464) | 详情 |
| 07c09799b08afb04c63a9de750b70aca | CVE-2022-26809, CVE-2022-24491, CVE-2022-24497, CVE-2022-26815, CVE-2022-26904 | 2022-04-13 07:51:00 | 微软2022年4月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f5b543501ed5679d423411edac502e24 | CVE-2022-22954, CVE-2022-22955, CVE-2022-22956, CVE-2022-22957, CVE-2022-22958, CVE-2022-22959, CVE-2022-22960, CVE-2022-22961 | 2022-04-08 03:49:31 | VMware 产品多个高危漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f421bcdb306e2bc1ffbf58fcb024a0dd | 2022-03-29 17:11:30 | Spring 框架远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 0473358d95e58c7c3f2e7db0109f56f4 | 2022-03-29 17:11:30 | Spring Framework 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-22965) | 详情 | |
| a888c948ca1172f8a06a3879479f1de4 | CVE-2022-22965 | 2022-03-29 17:11:30 | Spring Framework 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-22965) | 详情 |
| 71ed541bb737196268b75c7ba435e1a9 | 2022-03-28 04:57:30 | Spring Cloud Function SpEL表达式注入漏洞 | 详情 | |
| f7a5dcd376be777c6593a29b8ebd411a | CVE-2022-0778 | 2022-03-18 07:09:22 | OpenSSL拒绝服务漏洞(CVE-2022-0778) | 详情 |
| 6c4124fed44906a79843cd2dd383c695 | CVE-2022-0847 | 2022-03-15 03:32:03 | Linux Kernel本地提权漏洞(CVE-2022-0847) | 详情 |
| a2795e4829bff16f108cf191eba663c3 | CVE-2022-21990, CVE-2022-24508, CVE-2022-23277 | 2022-03-11 02:14:56 | 微软2022年3月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| d09f0641bf65c64a16d802cd78e14097 | CVE-2022-0847 | 2022-03-08 08:23:08 | Linux 内核本地提权漏洞(CVE-2022-0847) | 详情 |
| 69052e2a8c09416f5df674f92cba25a6 | CVE-2022-22947 | 2022-03-02 11:42:55 | Spring Cloud Gateway 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-22947) | 详情 |
| 5f42b6f584a9ace426787dc8dfd6e6e5 | 2022-02-16 10:44:18 | 向日葵远程命令执行漏洞(CNVD-2022-10270) | 详情 | |
| 79556071f6236ab4674f75b3beee4d79 | CVE-2022-24112 | 2022-02-11 06:13:35 | Apache APISIX 远程代码执行漏洞 (CVE-2022-24112) | 详情 |
| 485f2c57713f4a39830e8c2d01e43cfe | CVE-2021-4034 | 2022-01-26 06:19:16 | Linux Polkit 权限提升漏洞(CVE-2021-4034) | 详情 |
| 0aa6eab412c0318b74c6a470ee774df1 | CVE-2022-21907, CVE-2022-21969, CVE-2022-21846, CVE-2022-21855, CVE-2022-21874, CVE-2022-21893, CVE-2022-21850, CVE-2022-21851, CVE-2022-21836, CVE-2022-21919 | 2022-01-12 03:44:50 | 微软2022年1月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 88a8c676b52a739c0335d7c21ca810a9 | 2022-01-06 08:19:17 | MeterSphere 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 76cad61d2d5a8750a6a714ab2c6dbc97 | CVE-2021-45232 | 2021-12-28 10:31:16 | Apache APISIX Dashboard 接口未授权访问漏洞(CVE-2021-45232) | 详情 |
| af4f5f63390eb00de8705b5029d8c376 | CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046 | 2021-12-14 01:56:52 | Apache Log4j 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 43456ae172e45c12087c40c03d925e0e | CVE-2021-44228 | 2021-12-11 03:21:34 | Apache Log4j 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 392b133d98d6f61aee36ce6c8784f4df | 2021-12-09 15:20:54 | Apache Log4j 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 1e193280a8f45427c06cb4945be4f126 | 2021-12-07 06:48:55 | Grafana 任意文件读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 红后 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6fa0a347889bf0da0cae47ef068a6a99 | CVE-2023-32836 | 2023-11-16 21:05:37 | GOOGLE ANDROID Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 49751f9f84ed69956c96cc87959ec666 | CVE-2021-22499 | 2023-11-16 21:05:34 | Micro Focus Application Performance Management 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| eaa040f80d817832a627456843d3e24c | CVE-2021-23883 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | 迈克菲 McAfee Endpoint Security 代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| d52ddce51389f668d6fad6e7044bd974 | CVE-2021-23878 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | 迈克菲 McAfee Endpoint Security 加密问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| b62432054e9970a34c4d9e4d9efd1075 | CVE-2023-32838 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | GOOGLE ANDROID Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 162855c32b8e1a1dafd6ef3e7a3b3da8 | CVE-2022-43554 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | IVANTI AVALANCHE Vulnerability | 详情 |
| dff8e982c8571446fc1d46fdb5263781 | CVE-2021-21019 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | Adobe Magento 注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5c28bf13629d4240819bb4f492d588a9 | CVE-2022-34396 | 2023-11-15 21:56:12 | DELL OPENMANAGE_SERVER_ADMINISTRATOR Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 8876fd1be50182e42f17aaf033bfaf25 | CVE-2022-45098 | 2023-11-15 21:56:10 | DELL EMC_POWERSCALE_ONEFS Vulnerability | 详情 |
| d8a4cb7ca4e0f29533302f9f97f22a55 | CVE-2022-45102 | 2023-11-15 21:55:56 | DELL Multiple product Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 72e081fb5149198ecc92f3f06383f0d5 | CVE-2023-0512 | 2023-11-15 21:55:53 | VIM VIM Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 741e4f08caf4baef7072136884f07ae6 | CVE-2023-24829 | 2023-11-15 21:55:48 | APACHE IOTDB Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 06eca26d44409544e5ec96702bf85ce0 | CVE-2023-23628 | 2023-11-15 21:54:44 | METABASE METABASE Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 830da4b9e4f027d37c9e39125a30cc18 | CVE-2022-3488 | 2023-11-15 21:54:27 | ISC BIND Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 93ceb6d645101eee2b05535717260299 | CVE-2022-45808 | 2023-11-15 21:54:21 | THIMPRESS LEARNPRESS Vulnerability | 详情 |
| d79756a4e0c6522a5ba958c82d0b4c88 | CVE-2023-22482 | 2023-11-15 21:54:17 | LINUXFOUNDATION ARGO-CD Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 1c317622086c85695ff9266e3c5cf66f | CVE-2022-4323 | 2023-11-15 21:54:16 | SUMO GOOGLE_ANALYTICATOR Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 6e8e12e7cd90fd6550e5cef8c12a4a50 | CVE-2023-24069 | 2023-11-15 21:54:13 | SIGNAL SIGNAL-DESKTOP Vulnerability | 详情 |
| de78bbaf8c5f6d744b657b8b7733d20e | CVE-2023-24044 | 2023-11-15 21:54:12 | PLESK OBSIDIAN Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 44e1e95916d186bbbc5cabca01532712 | CVE-2022-41733 | 2023-11-15 21:54:05 | IBM INFOSPHERE_INFORMATION_SERVER Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 136d79ca309f157fcf93764b6993609c | CVE-2022-20752 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | Cisco Unified Communications Manager 和 Cisco Unity Connection安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| cfa598cc25996bf7c25d8622f86868f3 | CVE-2022-32208 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | curl 缓冲区错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5dc2248c28a031fb6cb3e94f714da748 | CVE-2021-31677 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | PESCMS 跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2df25199d06527c66c1929ede927aa18 | CVE-2022-20800 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | Cisco Unified Communications Manager 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 537152d5106a70b12b4e0204db3ba5b3 | CVE-2022-2304 | 2023-11-15 20:59:34 | Vim 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| dee30b1a759cdba8cda08222c3b6cf63 | CVE-2022-2309 | 2023-11-15 20:59:34 | lxml 和 libxml2 代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| edc189cc3f6caea2e67f158e0f93dd19 | CVE-2022-31116 | 2023-11-15 20:59:34 | UltraJSON 其他漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3e53baf169ff30745b9dfa6f9505233b | CVE-2022-20791 | 2023-11-15 20:59:26 | Cisco Unified Communications Manager 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6ae237378a32e08e6f0495fa3dbce32b | CVE-2022-20812 | 2023-11-15 20:59:26 | Cisco Expressway Series 和 Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| a2523ef82d3016d54faf64dd9af12f3f | CVE-2022-31129 | 2023-11-15 20:59:26 | Moment.js 资源管理错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 绿盟 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07ff13766e6eda544e413ceb300607e9 | CVE-2024-12312 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Print Science Designer plugin不受信任数据反序列化漏洞 | 详情 |
| 96e0b0c91b06d953b4a5ecfec71bc612 | CVE-2024-12329 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Essential Real Estate plugin敏感信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 205143180fd646aa434da08572dc37a5 | CVE-2024-12564 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | Open Design Alliance CDE inWEB SDK敏感信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 78c4aba7419004dcc8345585d527ae37 | CVE-2024-12333 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Woodmart theme代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2d3fe5437226d262f5c3df68dba66d7c | CVE-2024-11760 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Currency Converter Widget PRO plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 319c981098d0f2d7bc91e06390e4800c | CVE-2024-12160 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Seraphinite Bulk Discounts for WooCommerce跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 9c491939e6e0bd7c2901366e18b6d07c | CVE-2024-10043 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | GitLab EE授权错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| b01d6119078e51c36fd74abe01052e61 | CVE-2024-12201 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Hash Form plugin授权缺失漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1589394801933a9f20626d1ddb8fceee | CVE-2024-12397 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | Quarkus HTTP请求夹带漏洞 | 详情 |
| d03ae50732ec3864b9ee63b6ca0d6819 | CVE-2024-11727 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress NotificationX plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2a7dc7fdb9b96a3347032f71650e65e0 | CVE-2024-12401 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | cert-manager输入验证错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 96ac6565cb6d60af90a82f5ca6441700 | CVE-2024-11724 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Cookie Consent for WP plugin授权缺失漏洞 | 详情 |
| ef7b44b2166f0d595eba2dc2089677ea | CVE-2024-21574 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | ComfyUI-Manager代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| a3bd04b9029a521aaf5f3ffe4484cd2d | CVE-2024-11181 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Greenshift plugin信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 09791539b80d43a3e70c0c615a371846 | CVE-2024-12265 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Web3 Crypto Payments by DePay for WooCommerce授权缺失漏洞 | 详情 |
| f1ebe5e8c4d2b27532decaae22b958c3 | CVE-2024-46622 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | SecureAge Security Suite权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| 11c80e9d55ccd43a588f386f66557910 | CVE-2025-22395 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Dell Update Package Framework权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| 978a3b64cac54d324490e1d9ccb9d973 | CVE-2024-48455 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Netis Systems多款产品信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 937d32d09ab3d79285bd35cefe2e4fc8 | CVE-2024-54880 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | SeaCMS访问控制错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| b142cb6a61cb3f3bca079b01c03d1daa | CVE-2024-56828 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | ChestnutCMS文件上传漏洞 | 详情 |
| 565566dae4c14015c56f1686d51158d9 | CVE-2024-48457 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Netis Systems多款产品越界读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 88439523bbc7fbb5316a3d53d7ef8045 | CVE-2024-48456 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Netis Systems多款产品越界读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 48d06e40461ebe2a07d633bbaac7f98b | CVE-2024-12402 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Themes Coder Plugin权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| 091cbc8c2acc33047566c6ba72c0a5f2 | CVE-2024-11777 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Sell Media Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 992986b17991ac85700a5c82085792fe | CVE-2024-55074 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Grocy跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6dde449c96bd83c445bd0f39adf55b81 | CVE-2024-11290 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Member Access Plugin信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| b44a11235219206cb5e4232040129753 | CVE-2024-12098 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress ARS Affiliate Page Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6c2b3d895b8b3067dd3c52f6ee79ce05 | CVE-2024-11337 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Horoscope And Tarot Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3f7a46526136bcfc4aa36cc908a1439c | CVE-2024-12541 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Chative Live chat and Chatbot Plugin跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 7ba57109b7dd16786a8483309a85c322 | CVE-2024-11899 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Slider Pro Lite Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 美国国家漏洞数据库(NVD) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c6b3897e8411249dddc03a2582c3afdc | CVE-2023-45955 | 2023-10-31 18:15:08 | An issue discovered in Nanoleaf Light strip v3.5.10 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted write binding attribute commands. | 详情 |
| 752c86d745d9d6748f49970fc6c72bf7 | CVE-2022-48189 | 2023-10-30 15:15:39 | An SMM driver input validation vulnerability in the BIOS of some ThinkPad models could allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | 详情 |
| 8e0bb5e55759a9b19da4ce8a5bf48799 | CVE-2022-4573 | 2023-10-30 15:15:39 | An SMI handler input validation vulnerability in the ThinkPad X1 Fold Gen 1 could allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | 详情 |
| 790b026d2f9b8a38a121baf7cc9fbbe2 | CVE-2023-45797 | 2023-10-30 07:15:12 | A Buffer overflow vulnerability in DreamSecurity MagicLine4NX versions 1.0.0.1 to 1.0.0.26 allows an attacker to remotely execute code. | 详情 |
| 9fee627171b8e0c7c2f065dae65c293c | CVE-2023-46468 | 2023-10-28 01:15:51 | An issue in juzawebCMS v.3.4 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file to the custom plugin function. | 详情 |
| 1f2c404d06acfac83f7761c8ab878dee | CVE-2023-43322 | 2023-10-28 01:15:51 | ZPE Systems, Inc Nodegrid OS v5.0.0 to v5.0.17, v5.2.0 to v5.2.19, v5.4.0 to v5.4.16, v5.6.0 to v5.6.13, v5.8.0 to v5.8.10, and v5.10.0 to v5.10.3 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the endpoint /v1/system/toolkit/files/. | 详情 |
| eea9f6fc871d45cb3672714124c1d416 | CVE-2023-46211 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Auth. (contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Ultimate Addons for WPBakery Page Builder plugin <=Â 3.19.14 versions. | 详情 |
| 8496e7ff58df6fda25c681900fb6dfb8 | CVE-2023-46209 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in G5Theme Grid Plus – Unlimited grid plugin <= 1.3.2 versions. | 详情 |
| 751468e26927001b02f1b97a3d980488 | CVE-2023-46208 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in StylemixThemes Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing plugin <= 1.4.6 versions. | 详情 |
| 26e1875553f4c463d954949d41128765 | CVE-2023-46200 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Stephen Darlington, Wandle Software Limited Smart App Banner plugin <=Â 1.1.3 versions. | 详情 |
| a86c2cbf359259b1e38cd6e0c560a363 | CVE-2023-46509 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | An issue in Contec SolarView Compact v.6.0 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the texteditor.php component. | 详情 |
| c608240b549dc25f03e04b5397e48e1b | CVE-2023-46199 | 2023-10-27 08:15:31 | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Triberr plugin <=Â 4.1.1 versions. | 详情 |
| c4bd3098463c3624a284c838fd6ecb48 | CVE-2023-46194 | 2023-10-27 08:15:31 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Eric Teubert Archivist – Custom Archive Templates plugin <= 1.7.5 versions. | 详情 |
| e79edbb292a519fa08055a884d86921e | CVE-2023-46192 | 2023-10-27 08:15:31 | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Internet Marketing Ninjas Internal Link Building plugin <=Â 1.2.3 versions. | 详情 |
| 528422b82114eedfc8a332c895b5d475 | CVE-2023-46504 | 2023-10-27 04:15:10 | Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PwnCYN YXBOOKCMS v.1.0.2 allows a physically proximate attacker to execute arbitrary code via the library name function in the general settings component. | 详情 |
| 4b4a8cd15c35de7b7cb3e0f5110f178b | CVE-2023-46503 | 2023-10-27 04:15:10 | Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PwnCYN YXBOOKCMS v.1.0.2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the reader management and book input modules. | 详情 |
| 9637804577e375e89e0c34d1e9dc7daa | CVE-2023-46505 | 2023-10-27 01:15:32 | Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in FanCMS v.1.0.0 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the content1 parameter in the demo.php file. | 详情 |
| ccc0d1dc9e1e6371fc7ed4a7e6bc67c9 | CVE-2023-46491 | 2023-10-27 00:15:09 | ZenTao Biz version 4.1.3 and before has a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Version Library. | 详情 |
| 925767e89590e6107a882a20468a3153 | CVE-2023-42188 | 2023-10-27 00:15:09 | IceCMS v2.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | 详情 |
| 8affd999965e83dbd42583837011424c | CVE-2023-42406 | 2023-10-26 22:15:08 | SQL injection vulnerability in D-Link Online behavior audit gateway DAR-7000 V31R02B1413C allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the editrole.php component. | 详情 |
| 7d0ccfb0da7a7225f1fd25c20c95a57e | CVE-2023-46435 | 2023-10-26 18:15:08 | Sourcecodester Packers and Movers Management System v1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via mpms/?p=services/view_service&id. | 详情 |
| 0ab665a469513a0f70af2e1f17519e41 | CVE-2023-5792 | 2023-10-26 17:15:10 | A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Sticky Notes App 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file endpoint/delete-note.php. The manipulation of the argument note leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-243598 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. | 详情 |
| 692b9ba4d9cf7c90b6a3e5b8396a5302 | CVE-2023-5791 | 2023-10-26 17:15:10 | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in SourceCodester Sticky Notes App 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file endpoint/add-note.php. The manipulation of the argument noteTitle/noteContent leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-243597 was assigned to this vulnerability. | 详情 |
| 7e262fff58c0ebc8ddc6cdfb7535d7e2 | CVE-2023-5790 | 2023-10-26 17:15:10 | A vulnerability classified as critical was found in SourceCodester File Manager App 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file endpoint/add-file.php. The manipulation of the argument uploadedFileName leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-243595. | 详情 |
| c643f1003e7a0ee28d9e54cda26d6b85 | CVE-2023-43208 | 2023-10-26 17:15:09 | NextGen Healthcare Mirth Connect before version 4.4.1 is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution. Note that this vulnerability is caused by the incomplete patch of CVE-2023-37679. | 详情 |
| 3d3bc04cd7ec7fdf5aaaa0aa0a140b90 | CVE-2023-46450 | 2023-10-26 15:15:09 | Sourcecodester Free and Open Source inventory management system 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the Add supplier function. | 详情 |
| 844b1b549a5543c879cdc68d7237f444 | CVE-2023-46449 | 2023-10-26 15:15:09 | Sourcecodester Free and Open Source inventory management system v1.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. An arbitrary user can change the password of another user and takeover the account via IDOR in the password change function. | 详情 |
| f494a8af43bc7ce0e5b6f1d2f18f3740 | CVE-2023-46081 | 2023-10-26 13:15:09 | Unauth. Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lavacode Lava Directory Manager plugin <=Â 1.1.34 versions. | 详情 |
| 3a451401fdd162ad57ab72c2f5d7b984 | CVE-2023-46077 | 2023-10-26 13:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Arrow Plugins The Awesome Feed – Custom Feed plugin <= 2.2.5 versions. | 详情 |
| 428d0a0df20b616e36d68a5b76023a38 | CVE-2023-46076 | 2023-10-26 13:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in RedNao WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder, Create invoices, packing slips and more plugin <=Â 1.2.102 versions. | 详情 |