| 360 网络安全响应中心 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4d42b2e96c478df11ac597898d1526f0 | 2024-04-17 11:18:19 | 2024-04 补丁日: Oracle多个产品漏洞安全风险通告 | 详情 | |
| 448cfa0216a0757ec96f5862f86eafd4 | 2024-04-01 10:42:50 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-25 第13周 | 详情 | |
| 1205680821e2717a58c599f99a9fb422 | 2024-03-26 07:23:13 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-18 第12周 | 详情 | |
| 2e93df858fc2c5b287883dc9313a87fc | 2024-03-18 07:07:47 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-11 第11周 | 详情 | |
| c1cad147c12a38c089cd941022bc395e | 2024-03-13 04:34:11 | 2024-03 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 | |
| 7119e349c423ea015d6f2a824c67ed63 | 2024-03-11 06:17:28 | 安全事件周报 2024-03-04 第10周 | 详情 | |
| b2c0e23dcf540c0b5d2bb144ceade98d | CVE-2024-27198 | 2024-03-06 08:44:35 | CVE-2024-27198:JetBrains TeamCity 身份验证绕过漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 5e103cbd4bae3244e692ba33c1d7fcf8 | 2024-03-04 07:07:59 | 安全事件周报 2024-02-26 第9周 | 详情 | |
| cab02a763bf285b3dc009731f40f8c29 | CVE-2024-25065 | 2024-03-01 09:06:25 | CVE-2024-25065:Apache OFBiz目录遍历漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 194761e30d263596338cc998ac88cbaa | 2024-02-28 08:51:55 | SupermanMiner挖矿木马新变种持续活跃 | 详情 | |
| 213a4c5c76a220c24da1c38c605fcc10 | CVE-2024-25600 | 2024-02-27 09:55:55 | CVE-2024-25600:WordPress Bricks Builder远程命令执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| bc2c3923f651854c68f2dd6f99d69f0a | 2024-02-26 03:00:09 | 安全事件周报 2024-02-19 第8周 | 详情 | |
| 55c72f6f2af616fbddbb643df06c3b3a | CVE-2024-21413 | 2024-02-23 06:57:46 | CVE-2024-21413:Microsoft Outlook 远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f000a20bfa53fd8b0f5231b52ff34577 | 2024-02-19 10:10:13 | 2024-02 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 | |
| 48ff3925c0cc22862b0d6e1f52140bdc | 2024-02-06 07:10:07 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-29 第5周 | 详情 | |
| d8c34853fbcc6b39ae0a3783c6fa6d44 | CVE-2024-21626 | 2024-02-01 08:38:56 | CVE-2024-21626:runc容器逃逸漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 6ff357e8344fde5ea96c964cc0161137 | 2024-01-29 10:02:54 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-22 第4周 | 详情 | |
| 8fc558ad63c1387fb3ed919bf754820e | CVE-2024-0204 | 2024-01-25 08:26:39 | CVE-2024-0204:GoAnywhere MFT 身份认证绕过漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f4359caac3c70e9141439aa773e1e8a5 | 2024-01-22 11:39:38 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-15 第3周 | 详情 | |
| 4939f25b3f3d3242726cd400c645be04 | CVE-2024-0519 | 2024-01-17 09:08:07 | CVE-2024-0519:Google Chrome V8越界访问漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 300687d61adecf75afb4de6d78398518 | CVE-2024-0519 | 2024-01-17 08:09:14 | CVE-2024-0519:Google Chrome V8类型混淆漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 28f74976e64bebdcd2b71df42f44817e | CVE-2023-22527 | 2024-01-16 09:50:35 | CVE-2023-22527:Atlassian Confluence 远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| ec39eae21390157f92422897b04aad66 | 2024-01-15 08:28:24 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-08 第2周 | 详情 | |
| de12aee5eaff6382190430b22e2c643f | 2024-01-11 10:55:37 | 2024-01 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 | |
| c2b35c67c2732343be5c23579ebcdd04 | 2024-01-08 07:37:47 | 安全事件周报 2024-01-01 第1周 | 详情 | |
| 666a3a36b86650d472f7203220b3a4f5 | 2024-01-02 09:34:01 | 安全事件周报 2023-12-25 第52周 | 详情 | |
| f91862c02f62f7f8e9d01e209e59487b | CVE-2023-51467 | 2023-12-27 08:57:10 | CVE-2023-51467:Apache OFBiz 未授权远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 0c520d1f3614bc8cba4450fee6f03f5d | 2023-12-25 08:21:40 | 安全事件周报 2023-12-18 第51周 | 详情 | |
| ffb5d5f9ba0fa1576f9bd8325a8d3e66 | 2023-12-18 08:50:39 | 安全事件周报 2023-12-11 第50周 | 详情 | |
| 382c73d6388430b9cea6072c6c61858e | 2023-12-13 08:50:10 | 2023-12 补丁日: 微软多个漏洞安全更新通告 | 详情 |
| Tenable (Nessus) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4ed86f7a30dab4ec0625302ce3083bd0 | CVE-2026-55964 | 2026-06-25 20:17:16 ![]() |
Chain intermediate CA:TRUE without keyCertSign accepted as a signing CA. Intermediate CA certificates are required to have the keyCertSign key usage when a Key Usage extension is present, but chain-supplied temporary CAs (WOLFSSL_TEMP_CA) added while building a certificate path were previously exempted from this check, so an intermediate asserting CA:TRUE but lacking keyCertSign was accepted as a signing CA. The check now applies to chain-supplied temporary CAs as well; only operator-loaded root certificates (WOLFSSL_USER_CA) and self-signed roots remain exempt. Per RFC 5280 an absent Key Usage extension implies all usages, so the requirement is enforced only when the extension is actually present (extKeyUsageSet). Affects the OpenSSL-compatibility certificate-path-building path (X509_verify_cert / X509_STORE, OPENSSL_EXTRA/OPENSSL_ALL), where untrusted chain intermediates are added as temporary CAs; native (non-OpenSSL-compat) certificate verification does not create temporary CAs and is unaffected. Within those builds, the check applies unless ALLOW_INVALID_CERTSIGN is defined. | 详情 |
| 128bb2c0c1e14d24d600711dd4f4daa9 | CVE-2026-55960 | 2026-06-25 20:17:16 ![]() |
Un-negotiated Raw Public Key (RFC 7250) accepted in place of an X.509 certificate, bypassing chain validation. A raw public key has no chain, so ParseCertRelative() accepts it without performing any trust verification; it must therefore only be accepted when RPK was actually negotiated for that peer. The check now defaults the expected type to X.509 (per RFC 7250/8446) when no type was negotiated, comparing against the received server certificate type on the client and the selected client certificate type on the server, and rejects any mismatch, including an un-negotiated raw public key, with UNSUPPORTED_CERTIFICATE. Only affects builds with Raw Public Key support (HAVE_RPK) enabled - disabled by default in a standalone build, but included in --enable-all. | 详情 |
| 9a5edb86088c7e0c6b050f1448520477 | CVE-2026-37453 | 2026-06-25 20:17:11 ![]() |
Insecure Permissions vulnerability in MSI NBFoundation Service v.2.0.2506.1201 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the MSI_SERVICE_2 pipe | 详情 |
| b6643db14d2930e5d824c49c4146bff0 | CVE-2026-10097 | 2026-06-25 20:17:09 ![]() |
ML-KEM-1024 x64 AVX2 implicit rejection failure in the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform breaks IND-CCA2 security, allowing decapsulation to deviate from the implicit-rejection behavior required by the standard. The AVX2 constant-time ciphertext comparison used during decapsulation never compared the final 32-byte block of the 1568-byte ML-KEM-1024 ciphertext, so a ciphertext manipulated only in those final bytes would compare as equal and decapsulation returned the real shared secret instead of performing the required implicit rejection. | 详情 |
| ef4e5d0051ef982360c3bfe4c0600b42 | CVE-2026-56790 | 2026-06-25 19:16:45 ![]() |
CANBoat through 6.22, fixed in commit a5a22b7, contains an off-by-one global buffer overflow in the searchForPgn() function in analyzer/pgn.c that allows remote attackers to crash the application. Attackers can deliver a crafted NMEA-2000 message with an out-of-range PGN value over CAN bus or N2K-over-IP to trigger an out-of-bounds array access and denial of service. | 详情 |
| 80d9bda2a8c12b165909f33608dd9332 | CVE-2026-56789 | 2026-06-25 19:16:45 ![]() |
RTKLIB through 2.4.3 contains a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the readrnxobsb function in src/rinex.c that allows attackers to trigger memory corruption by failing to clamp satellite count values from RINEX epoch headers. Attackers can craft malicious RINEX files declaring more than 64 satellites per epoch to cause heap buffer overflow writes and out-of-bounds stack reads, crashing RTKLIB-based applications including rnx2rtkp and RTKPOST. | 详情 |
| 7548e2453a56949ec171d6d5dea2f323 | CVE-2026-56788 | 2026-06-25 19:16:45 ![]() |
RTKLIB through 2.4.3 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in getcodepri function when processing unrecognized RINEX observation codes, allowing attackers to trigger denial of service. Crafted RINEX files with unknown observation types cause negative array indexing into the codepris table, resulting in reliable crashes and potential memory disclosure of adjacent global data. | 详情 |
| 52a11651a9b5dd9eed849cd8f675f5c1 | CVE-2026-56787 | 2026-06-25 19:16:45 ![]() |
RTKLIB through 2.4.3 contains an off-by-one out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the decode_ssr3 function at src/rtcm3.c:1446 that allows remote attackers to trigger a global buffer overflow via crafted RTCM3 SSR messages with attacker-controlled signal mode fields. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending malicious SSR correction streams over NTRIP or serial connections to cause denial of service or crash RTKLIB rovers and CORS servers. | 详情 |
| d14839c4f6300c8bb4cf113ebf24860e | CVE-2026-56779 | 2026-06-25 19:16:44 ![]() |
MaxKB before 2.10.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in tool creation and update endpoints that allows authenticated users to make arbitrary server requests by supplying unvalidated downloadCallbackUrl and download_url parameters. Attackers with default workspace USER role can exploit this to access internal network services by providing malicious URLs to the ToolSerializer endpoints. | 详情 |
| 755c668561e6e0383f067b170f2b8b39 | CVE-2026-56771 | 2026-06-25 19:16:44 ![]() |
NewsBlur before version 14.5.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the add_url endpoint that allows authenticated users to make arbitrary server requests to internal networks by failing to filter private IP addresses. Attackers can exploit this to access localhost services and cloud metadata endpoints, enabling internal network scanning and sensitive data exfiltration. | 详情 |
| fb030bb16973f928fcaf6baaf92d666e | CVE-2026-53950 | 2026-06-24 19:17:12 | @tryghost/activitypub is Ghost’s social/federation client app. Prior to 3.1.0, the ActivityPub client in Ghost was vulnerable to JavaScript injection on posts shared by a maliciously customised ActivityPub server. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.0. | 详情 |
| e2d7e99decf7878956e8d751d11f8bc5 | CVE-2026-53949 | 2026-06-24 19:17:12 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 5.46.1 until 6.21.2, the validation applied to filters on the public API endpoints could be partially bypassed, making it possible to reveal private fields via a brute force attack. If SQLite was used as the database password hashes were fully accessible. If MySQL was used as the database the password hashes' case (uppercase / lowercase) would have been lost, which would likely have rendered a further brute force attack on the discovered hashes fruitless. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.21.2. | 详情 |
| e0c839d6a97103a99e88d45821520672 | CVE-2026-53948 | 2026-06-24 19:17:12 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.19.4 until 6.21.1, insufficient validation of the client-supplied Content-Type on Ghost's Admin API file upload endpoint allowed uploaded files to be served from the site with an attacker-chosen content type on S3/GCS storage backends. On installations that serve uploaded files from the same origin as the site, this could have been used to facilitate stored cross-site scripting against site visitors or staff. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.21.1. | 详情 |
| 397c6973deea785ce4c2758c82a558e0 | CVE-2026-53947 | 2026-06-24 19:17:12 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 5.18.0 until 6.21.1, a discrepancy in responses from the members signin endpoints made it possible for an unauthenticated attacker to determine whether a given email address belongs to a registered member of a Ghost site. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.21.1. | 详情 |
| 04e3e1bba630e43c2fc957187f647f46 | CVE-2026-53946 | 2026-06-24 19:17:12 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.19.4 until 6.21.1, when re-rendering posts, Ghost would refetch missing image dimensions by issuing an outbound HTTP request to the URL stored on an image card — without restricting that URL to trusted image hosts. An authenticated staff user able to create or edit posts could therefore point an image card at an attacker-chosen host and cause the Ghost server to request it on their behalf, including hosts on internal networks or cloud instance metadata endpoints that would not normally be reachable from the public internet. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.21.1. | 详情 |
| 7b6def2356a3c17664402f134c34c5c2 | CVE-2026-53945 | 2026-06-24 19:17:12 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.0.9 until 6.21.1, Ghost’s private-IP check for outbound HTTP requests could be bypassed via DNS rebinding, allowing an attacker to coerce the Ghost server into reaching hosts on internal networks through features that issue external fetches. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.21.1. | 详情 |
| d5340c583136de953ab7cc727a231aed | CVE-2026-53944 | 2026-06-24 19:17:11 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From 6.0.9 until 6.21.1, when making an external request, it is possible to bypass the IP filter that ensures the request isn't going to an internal service using an IPv6 literal which maps to a private IPv4 address. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.21.1. | 详情 |
| 419f62d3728ff84144f42f38d9905b31 | CVE-2026-53943 | 2026-06-24 19:17:11 | Ghost is a Node.js content management system. From until 6.37.0, when Ghost is behind a shared caching layer that results in cached content being shared between different visitors, an unauthenticated user could send an x-ghost-preview header that altered the rendered frontend response. In affected cache configurations, that response could be stored and served to subsequent visitors requesting the same page, allowing cache poisoning of request-specific preview output. When running Ghost's frontend and admin panel on the same domain this could be used to take over staff user accounts. When running these on different domains staff accounts have no exposure. This vulnerability is fixed in 6.37.0. | 详情 |
| 65f72bb015bfeeeef8ef9295285c0a5c | CVE-2026-49980 | 2026-06-24 19:17:11 | Rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.46.0 until 1.74.3, rclone rcd --rc-serve accepts unauthenticated GET and HEAD requests to paths of the form: /[remote:path]/object. The remote value is parsed from the URL and passed to normal backend initialization. Inline remote configuration can set backend options that execute local commands during initialization. As a result, a single unauthenticated GET or HEAD request can execute a command as the rclone process user. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.74.3. | 详情 |
| 77fc6ceafd61ddcf1c4f94916389968d | CVE-2026-49247 | 2026-06-24 19:17:11 | Jellyfin is an open source self hosted media server. From 10.9.0 until 10.11.10, the POST /ClientLog/Document endpoint accepts the Authorization header's Client and Version fields and uses them unsanitized as components of the on-disk filename when persisting client-uploaded log documents. As a result, any authenticated non-admin user can include ../ sequences in the Client field to cause Jellyfin to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary paths reachable by the Jellyfin service user, with a forced .log suffix. This vulnerability is fixed in 10.11.10. | 详情 |
| eb2d2f679b52b8c8942162d1bc8f27ea | CVE-2026-54762 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 3.7.0-ea.1 until 3.7.5, there is a medium severity vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Ingress NGINX provider that causes affected routes to fail open. When an Ingress explicitly enables BasicAuth or DigestAuth through the supported nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/auth-type and auth-secret annotations, but the referenced auth Secret cannot be resolved or parsed, Traefik logs the resolution error, skips installing the authentication middleware, and still emits a router to the backend service. A route that operators intended to protect is therefore published to the data plane without its authentication control, allowing unauthenticated access to the backend. The trigger is an invalid or unresolved auth dependency — a missing, malformed, unreadable, or policy-denied Secret — rather than an intentionally unprotected route. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.5. | 详情 |
| aa1f00ce6226fb989196fb511852ec90 | CVE-2026-54761 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 3.6.21 and 3.7.5, there is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes Gateway provider affecting the crossProviderNamespaces allowlist. For HTTPRoute rules that declare multiple (WRR) backendRefs, Traefik evaluates the allowlist against the target backendRef.namespace instead of the route's own namespace. As a result, an HTTPRoute created in a namespace that is not allow-listed can reference a cross-provider TraefikService such as api@internal, dashboard@internal or rest@internal by pointing backendRef.namespace at an allow-listed namespace covered by a Gateway API ReferenceGrant, exposing internal Traefik services on the data plane. Exploitation requires the ability to create an accepted HTTPRoute and a matching ReferenceGrant from an allow-listed namespace; it does not require any change to Traefik static configuration, RBAC, or the deployment itself. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.6.21 and 3.7.5. | 详情 |
| 8069ace04088d2238bdb566617079937 | CVE-2026-54555 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | rtk filters and compresses command outputs before they reach your LLM context. Prior to 0.42.2, the permission splitter did not conservatively split or reject several shell constructs that Bash treats as command execution boundaries or nested execution. As a result, a command beginning with an allowed prefix such as git could hide a second command behind one of these constructs. rtk rewrite returned exit code 0, causing the Claude hook to emit permissionDecision: "allow". The rewritten command still contained the hidden command, so it ran without the user confirmation or denial that the permission rules were intended to enforce. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.42.2. | 详情 |
| 89381ca00a9f68462ffeea5c6e2479ce | CVE-2026-54328 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | Pi is a minimal terminal coding harness. From 0.74.0 until 0.78.1, Pi versions with temporary npm or git extension package installs used predictable paths under the operating system temporary directory. On Linux-based multi-user systems, a local attacker who can write to the shared temporary directory could prepare the expected package location before another user runs pi with a temporary extension package source. Pi could then load attacker-controlled extension code in the victim user's process. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.78.1. | 详情 |
| 49988084a9c346d591fad256f37f8cd6 | CVE-2026-54327 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | Pi is a minimal terminal coding harness. From 0.74.0 until 0.78.1, Pi stored API keys and OAuth credentials in auth.json. A race condition in the file write path could briefly create or rewrite this file with permissions derived from the process umask before tightening the file to owner-only permissions. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.78.1. | 详情 |
| 4db78a10ccb78c444253ebdfc109ec90 | CVE-2026-54326 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | Pi is a minimal terminal coding harness. From 0.74.0 until 0.78.1, Pi HTML exports render session Markdown into a static HTML file. It did not consistently reject unsafe Markdown link and image URL schemes. In versions with scheme filtering, C0 control characters in the URL scheme could bypass the check because browsers normalize those characters before navigation. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.78.1. | 详情 |
| 230937ba8a02b18368fc94b0386d951d | CVE-2026-54325 | 2026-06-23 20:16:49 | Pi is a minimal terminal coding harness. Pi before 0.79.0 loaded project-local configuration and resources from a repository's .pi directory without first asking the user to trust that repository. This included project-local extensions, which are executable TypeScript or JavaScript modules loaded into the Pi process. An attacker who controls a repository could place Pi-specific project resources in that repository. If a user then started Pi from that working tree, the project-local extension code could run with the same privileges as the local Pi process without the user having a convenient way to make a trust decision. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.79.0. | 详情 |
| 4806347841f2fcb79d75537479a1e1b5 | CVE-2026-53622 | 2026-06-23 20:16:48 | Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 3.7.3, there is a critical vulnerability in Traefik's HTTP/3 (QUIC) TLS configuration selection that allows unauthenticated clients to bypass router-specific mTLS enforcement. When HTTP/3 is enabled on an entrypoint, the TLS handshake selects the applicable TLS configuration through an exact, case-sensitive lookup on the SNI value, which fails to match wildcard host patterns (e.g., *.example.com) or case variants of the configured hostname. Because the handshake falls back to the default TLS configuration — which may not require client certificates — a client can complete the QUIC handshake without presenting a certificate, while the subsequent HTTP routing layer still dispatches the request to a backend protected by a router-specific mTLS policy. The issue affects deployments where HTTP/3 is enabled, a router uses a wildcard Host rule or case-insensitive hostname matching, a router-specific TLSOptions enforces client certificate authentication, and UDP access to the entrypoint is reachable by an attacker. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3. | 详情 |
| ed33ef552d8fa70b93bc519146b939ba | CVE-2026-48491 | 2026-06-23 20:16:48 | Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. From 3.7.0 until 3.7.3, there is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's domain-fronting protection (SNICheck) that allows an unauthenticated client to bypass mutual TLS enforced through wildcard router TLSOptions. When a router uses a wildcard host rule such as Host(*.example.com) with stricter TLS options (for example RequireAndVerifyClientCert), SNICheck resolves the TLS options for the HTTP Host header using exact map lookups only and never applies wildcard matching. If another permissive SNI is served on the same entrypoint, an attacker can complete the TLS handshake under the permissive options and then send an HTTP Host header targeting the wildcard-protected backend, reaching it without presenting a client certificate. This affects the regular HTTPS / HTTP-2 path and does not require HTTP/3. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.3. | 详情 |
| 36b2372697a3885bde84baa666b4347f | CVE-2026-48020 | 2026-06-23 20:16:47 | Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to 2.11.48, 3.6.19, and 3.7.3, there is a high severity vulnerability in Traefik's StripPrefix middleware that allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass route-level authentication and authorization. When a public router matches on a PathPrefix rule and applies the StripPrefix middleware, a request path containing .. or its percent-encoded form %2e%2e can match the public route at routing time and then, after the prefix is stripped and the path is normalized, resolve to a path served by a separate, authenticated router. As a result, an attacker can reach protected backend paths — such as admin or internal configuration endpoints — without satisfying the authentication middleware attached to the protected router. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.11.48, 3.6.19, and 3.7.3. | 详情 |
| 国家信息安全漏洞共享平台(CNVD) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8686fda9b2b49e4e1666b54e2248f935 | CNVD-2021-74882 | 2021-11-14 16:43:52 | 四创科技有限公司建站系统存在SQL注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8f6972d84ad188b05ff9cc14d4334949 | CNVD-2021-87021 (CVE-2020-4690) | 2021-11-12 12:43:14 | IBM Security Guardium硬编码凭证漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3bfe7b053a0c59d8a3d38c18f86aa143 | CNVD-2021-87022 (CVE-2021-38870) | 2021-11-12 12:43:12 | IBM Aspera跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| a4649bb17f4db4d1c7f879ebceb46ed0 | CNVD-2021-87011 (CVE-2021-29753) | 2021-11-12 12:43:11 | IBM Business Automation Workflow存在未明漏洞 | 详情 |
| 094c613f9ed4b8b9d887dc912789043c | CNVD-2021-87025 (CVE-2021-20563) | 2021-11-12 12:43:10 | IBM Sterling File Gateway信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 41c47f01a4c65dcb6efc9ebf483fe762 | CNVD-2021-87010 (CVE-2021-38887) | 2021-11-12 12:43:08 | IBM InfoSphere Information Server信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| f51d33e7a09fd61ca90ede453515a830 | CNVD-2021-87016 (CVE-2021-29764) | 2021-11-12 12:43:07 | IBM Sterling B2B Integrator跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 33615a5f78df822e82e6d3436045c48c | CNVD-2021-87026 (CVE-2021-38877) | 2021-11-12 12:43:06 | IBM Jazz for Service Management跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8e729177bcb4105dd831fb1e123ed1bb | CNVD-2021-87014 (CVE-2021-29679) | 2021-11-12 12:43:04 | IBM Cognos Analytics远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1a3b856f78e9fbdca12aeddc7d665aca | CNVD-2021-87029 (CVE-2021-29752) | 2021-11-12 12:43:03 | IBM Db2信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6f1aa3a0cb819d97519baa47fd0232d5 | CNVD-2021-87015 (CVE-2021-29745) | 2021-11-12 12:43:02 | IBM Cognos Analytics权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| cbcb12f5f51d6e7d6d8a9fa581aa863a | CNVD-2021-73908 | 2021-11-11 16:42:44 | 泛微e-cology存在SQL注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| ae6fd467da55de31aa7219187cf5c2d4 | CNVD-2021-86904 (CVE-2021-20351) | 2021-11-11 08:31:46 | IBM Engineering跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 412a15b40959ed9cf9330ee79f99e079 | CNVD-2021-86903 (CVE-2021-31173) | 2021-11-11 08:31:44 | Microsoft SharePoint Server信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1cbc5d5faac431d3e82c9e5ea9588b5f | CNVD-2021-86902 (CVE-2021-31172) | 2021-11-11 08:31:43 | Microsoft SharePoint欺骗漏洞 | 详情 |
| 686c7cfb20933b41c3d679cbba79a2ad | CNVD-2021-86901 (CVE-2021-31181) | 2021-11-11 08:31:42 | Microsoft SharePoint远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72fdfb2d44c0d41d638e4632bdfc10b8 | CNVD-2021-86900 (CVE-2021-3561) | 2021-11-11 08:31:41 | fig2dev缓冲区溢出漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3ba6f0e9394f9414e2cadb9495e2d5f5 | CNVD-2021-85884 (CVE-2021-41210) | 2021-11-10 07:24:57 | Google TensorFlow堆分配数组越界读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 4d8c4744ea972fb2fcb9673fea1fc7b7 | CNVD-2021-85883 (CVE-2021-41226) | 2021-11-10 07:24:56 | Google TensorFlow堆越界访问漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8778f9cd924cae585ca5e2e0b8be3b3f | CNVD-2021-85882 (CVE-2021-41224) | 2021-11-10 07:24:54 | Google TensorFlow堆越界访问漏洞 | 详情 |
| e1b2722e6d5c509c680b584416d9cb20 | CNVD-2021-85881 (CVE-2021-42770) | 2021-11-10 07:24:53 | OPNsense跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| ed09c9fa5586e2d4d9b4e95fe3b447a0 | CNVD-2021-85880 (CVE-2021-28024) | 2021-11-10 07:24:52 | ServiceTonic访问控制不当漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8a642f0922f7f915e81b2b947276a96c | CNVD-2021-85879 (CVE-2021-28023) | 2021-11-10 07:24:50 | ServiceTonic任意文件上传漏洞 | 详情 |
| c00b061c2cfdee4016a869a188135db5 | CNVD-2021-85878 (CVE-2021-28022) | 2021-11-10 07:24:49 | ServiceTonic SQL注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 9c4b20a28ad2bd4ab916448f0e1272bd | CNVD-2021-85877 (CVE-2021-32483) | 2021-11-10 07:24:48 | Cloudera Manager不正确访问控制漏洞 | 详情 |
| 4d4423857b7b1f38e49738f00e8949ba | CNVD-2021-85876 (CVE-2021-32481) | 2021-11-10 07:24:46 | Cloudera Hue跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6b12b7fc216d603e8e07351603851c86 | CNVD-2021-85875 (CVE-2021-29994) | 2021-11-10 07:24:45 | Cloudera Hue跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72894fb3a3538de240d2f6810aae63c9 | CNVD-2021-85892 (CVE-2021-42701) | 2021-11-10 02:38:27 | DAQFactory中间人攻击漏洞 | 详情 |
| 94a1f99a64ba24540cc1594d0a0b3152 | CNVD-2021-85893 (CVE-2021-42699) | 2021-11-10 02:38:26 | DAQFactory明文传输漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5d9bac33be8f2f88391f6de02fb89c73 | CNVD-2021-85894 (CVE-2021-42698) | 2021-11-10 02:38:24 | DAQFactory反序列化漏洞 | 详情 |
| 国家信息安全漏洞库(CNNVD) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b5815af17792cf5abac5732bae3094e9 | CNNVD-202308-131 (CVE-2023-20215) | 2023-08-03 12:41:47 | Cisco Secure Web Appliance 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8d98bb094a70919c9e881cc7da5898d4 | CNNVD-202308-132 (CVE-2023-20204) | 2023-08-03 12:40:44 | Cisco BroadWorks CommPilot 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| c65e18d821cb73d6036dc2df6a726951 | CNNVD-202308-123 (CVE-2023-29409) | 2023-08-02 12:45:03 | Google Golang 资源管理错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 452c53b54ef3a658eaf6bd8e7d93fe05 | CNNVD-202308-124 (CVE-2023-4070) | 2023-08-02 12:44:01 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| ac7b17414d163c2f26008516638e3a99 | CNNVD-202308-125 (CVE-2023-39113) | 2023-08-02 12:42:59 | ngiflib 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 224fd467b813dbee234efe1e61e2ec66 | CNNVD-202308-126 (CVE-2023-39114) | 2023-08-02 12:42:57 | ngiflib 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72d862f454eb3d0e4dd221413d85f6b2 | CNNVD-202308-127 (CVE-2023-1437) | 2023-08-02 12:42:55 | Advantech WebAccess/SCADA 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| a3b636c53a2116b7ab85ea0c29470e76 | CNNVD-202308-128 (CVE-2023-3329) | 2023-08-02 12:42:53 | SpiderControl SCADA Webserver 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| 0e8e3c3600e145e70920c2026bde8feb | CNNVD-202308-129 (CVE-2023-4069) | 2023-08-02 12:42:51 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 619ce483843859fb783525b2b8d00f59 | CNNVD-202308-130 (CVE-2023-4068) | 2023-08-02 12:41:48 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6a73381eaa628503bd8c242cd313f005 | CNNVD-202308-057 (CVE-2023-36121) | 2023-08-01 12:48:12 | e107 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 086c171bc44677f87e0ad45c8ab5dab6 | CNNVD-202308-058 (CVE-2023-2164) | 2023-08-01 12:47:10 | GitLab 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| bc6915cfb72ce7e27f2aa64ff3a35ee2 | CNNVD-202308-059 (CVE-2023-31432) | 2023-08-01 12:47:08 | Brocade Fabric OS 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 915090fa2939ee9d9978125be4eeff27 | CNNVD-202308-060 (CVE-2023-3739) | 2023-08-01 12:46:07 | Google Chrome 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| b790441bc923d37c914ea50edcdfaa16 | CNNVD-202308-061 (CVE-2023-3385) | 2023-08-01 12:46:05 | GitLab 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| a6be4479387eddda68e1c7808965c1bc | CNNVD-202308-062 (CVE-2022-40609) | 2023-08-01 12:46:03 | IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 55409ee74ffe87168f7d61814b568334 | CNNVD-202308-063 (CVE-2023-31431) | 2023-08-01 12:46:02 | Brocade Fabric OS 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| a4340da9d26800c671fa800a080c3d01 | CNNVD-202308-064 (CVE-2023-36210) | 2023-08-01 12:45:00 | MotoCMS 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| d70ae2187ae1aa50a2af6befce15bfbd | CNNVD-202308-065 (CVE-2023-31428) | 2023-08-01 12:43:58 | Brocade Fabric OS 代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8b0e98f117732e813318bdec77d0fb4b | CNNVD-202308-066 (CVE-2023-31928) | 2023-08-01 12:42:57 | Brocade Fabric OS 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 73ffd9540daad0a04d3d54041ba9df14 | CNNVD-202307-2321 (CVE-2023-37772) | 2023-07-31 12:44:10 | Online Shopping Portal 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 10f462bbd81ee431ab32c6a160fc068d | CNNVD-202307-2322 (CVE-2023-3983) | 2023-07-31 12:44:08 | Advantech iView 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 91dcd4420b85064dbae045bceabb71b9 | CNNVD-202307-2323 (CVE-2023-37496) | 2023-07-31 12:44:07 | HCL Technologies HCL Verse 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| c81e50233ec479272b638b8dbddedeea | CNNVD-202307-2324 (CVE-2023-38989) | 2023-07-31 12:44:05 | jeesite 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 775849c6f8c5fe41588806137e12cfa8 | CNNVD-202307-2326 (CVE-2023-3462) | 2023-07-31 12:44:03 | HashiCorp Vault 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| f995ebc4f6961ed50c6d18ec0f7efcf4 | CNNVD-202307-2327 (CVE-2022-42183) | 2023-07-31 12:44:01 | Precisely Spectrum Spatial Analyst 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 67539644d8b06577c03aeab1ac018450 | CNNVD-202307-2328 (CVE-2022-42182) | 2023-07-31 12:43:59 | Precisely Spectrum Spatial Analyst 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| b61f0e730dfb90bb1c6f8f6e83508ae7 | CNNVD-202307-2329 (CVE-2023-39122) | 2023-07-31 12:43:56 | BMC Control-M 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| a09d1da1d10d2b5f823d7b8b41490660 | CNNVD-202307-2330 (CVE-2023-3825) | 2023-07-31 12:42:54 | PTC Kepware KEPServerEX 资源管理错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 05caf2e95b7a0f72e0c071c443e1d82b | CNNVD-202307-2331 (CVE-2023-4033) | 2023-07-31 12:42:52 | Mlflow 操作系统命令注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 奇安信 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45ab4afdafe578698bcfccccd65d833e | yt | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0009 Microsoft Windows Type 1字体处理远程代码执行漏洞(ADV200006)通告 | 详情 | |
| 74691465618764c64d52a2ff58013ac4 | yt | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0013 Firefox远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-11707)预警通告 | 详情 | |
| 6bd01daffa85191c80698354fc8e252f | wt | QianxinTI-SV-2019-0015 Microsoft Windows RDP远程桌面服务多个远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 | |
| 59085bf4ae9a7a3802468d9764c94968 | wt | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0022 微软IE浏览器JScript脚本引擎远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 | |
| 7010355bb6ffff38cb1a885acf784ca7 | ft | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0008 Microsoft Windows SMBv3.0服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-0796)通告 | 详情 | |
| 5edb21a58a7e21692bd0ddd622d39279 | St | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0013 Microsoft DNS Server远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-1350)通告 | 详情 | |
| 3e8973410ef7c04408d63fa10c230487 | St | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0002 Microsoft IE jscript远程命令执行0day漏洞(CVE-2020-0674)通告 | 详情 | |
| e8bc02a0c3bfbafd4c84d9ec26e9bede | St | QianxinTI-SV-2020-0001 微软核心加密库漏洞(CVE-2020-0601)通告 | 详情 | |
| f749eac58b87d0954f0e4a84b5d67057 | CVE-2020-1350 | 2020-07-15 15:57:00 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0013 Microsoft DNS Server远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-1350)通告 | 详情 |
| 90b93cb7073fe73b17746ac166a09637 | CVE-2020-6819, CVE-2020-6820 | 2020-04-08 10:34:35 | QianxinTI-SV-2020-0012 Firefox在野远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-6819、CVE-2020-6820)通告 | 详情 |
| e318a5efa4803b50cdef480b90b1784d | 2020-03-25 13:58:51 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0009 Microsoft Windows Type 1字体处理远程代码执行漏洞(ADV200006)通告 | 详情 | |
| cffc3035f7899495cfeae521451f91b2 | CVE-2020-0796 | 2020-03-12 10:32:09 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0008 Microsoft Windows SMBv3.0服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2020-0796)通告 | 详情 |
| 3e6175d47d17c6f94bd9ba10d81c3717 | CVE-2020-0674 | 2020-03-02 14:52:46 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2020-0002 Microsoft IE jscript远程命令执行0day漏洞(CVE-2020-0674)通告 | 详情 |
| d99d073afb7d248a8a62fb068921997f | CVE-2020-0601 | 2020-01-15 14:11:41 | QianxinTI-SV-2020-0001 微软核心加密库漏洞(CVE-2020-0601)通告 | 详情 |
| b7b45b14a3af1225ef6eec72d74964df | CVE-2019-1367 | 2019-09-25 17:23:00 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0022 微软IE浏览器JScript脚本引擎远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 504fc79f0123db109a11b149c334b75c | CVE-2019-0708 | 2019-09-09 10:20:47 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0006 微软远程桌面服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-0708)预警通告 | 详情 |
| 5b727692d583d4a6e7cdb0f670eac12a | CVE-2019-1181, CVE-2019-1182, CVE-2019-1222, CVE-2019-1226 | 2019-08-14 11:09:05 | QianxinTI-SV-2019-0015 Microsoft Windows RDP远程桌面服务多个远程代码执行漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 54b48d765fccbc8dcfa3de0920459f8d | CVE-2019-11707 | 2019-06-19 16:53:47 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0013 Firefox远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-11707)预警通告 | 详情 |
| 5b4d5fea09fbc2dca45be53f162d39de | CVE-2019-0708 | 2019-05-31 17:03:19 | QiAnXinTI-SV-2019-0006 微软远程桌面服务远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2019-0708)预警通告 | 详情 |
| 安全客 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03afa8b4eaf4a0160784152fca5465b2 | CVE-2021-27308 | 2021-07-11 14:22:05 | 4images 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8b0ace4c54a7fc20a99d21e294152a99 | CVE-2020-15261 | 2021-07-11 14:22:05 | Veyon Service 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| d4f12de949590ab346b61986a29d8b4d | CVE-2021-35039 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | Linux kernel 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| f790e7ef3b5de3774d42ee32b9b10c01 | CVE-2021-34626 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | WordPress 访问控制错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 71bf261eb2113d5ff870ab9bafd29f55 | CVE-2021-25952 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | just-safe-set 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 152793cbc104933584f5f227606f433d | CVE-2021-0597 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | Google Android 信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 75f153c327984fdfdd2d9c463a91371d | CVE-2021-34430 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | Eclipse TinyDTLS 安全特征问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 9610336f1a41241cc8edea22a2780ec5 | CVE-2021-3638 | 2021-07-09 17:30:13 | QEMU 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 92fe450ae5c5dfa48072aca79d64ba63 | CVE-2021-34614 | 2021-07-09 14:24:32 | Aruba ClearPass Policy Manager 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 680a4218fc32922746717210664a3d62 | CVE-2021-22144 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Elasticsearch 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 373930f669f2c1f7b61101a925304779 | CVE-2021-24022 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Fortinet FortiManager 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8556f9cd0699f88c1f6cca9a43463bdd | CVE-2021-33012 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Allen Bradley Micrologix 1100输入验证错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 480ae713cc88cc0985e1ebc079974d83 | CVE-2021-0592 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Google Android 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8ef4dbefa6604ea2312621401c3ec0b9 | CVE-2021-1598 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Cisco Video Surveillance 7000 Series IP Cameras 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| d6e8714c32df7a0dcc2f3910ec68b42d | CVE-2021-20782 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Software License Manager 跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 4e60b22611b8bb0fd7e532896498af29 | CVE-2021-20781 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | WordPress 跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5ca48ad58fb499c069ae0800c3b39875 | CVE-2021-32961 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | MDT AutoSave代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2ed854890b43f08e52340a1e8fe6d39f | CVE-2021-0577 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Google Android 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8d63110e1475bbd245715b2ee1824d13 | CVE-2021-31816 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Octopus Server 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 72bef2ae2f5db7dd066e1cdefa618dc5 | CVE-2021-31817 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Octopus Server 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1f7369b2609dbd2cd40d091f7de540cd | CVE-2020-20217 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Mikrotik RouterOs 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1793176eecc5813c3348f026dc9909c9 | CVE-2020-28598 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | PrusaSlicer 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 7f4cf34ceb545548dcfcc3c0e7120268 | CVE-2021-32945 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | MDT AutoSave加密问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| 58553eb00d6e3e83b633f09464c4e98a | CVE-2021-29712 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | IBM InfoSphere Information Server 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| d8e27ec42fb0b89998fcc006f49b249b | CVE-2021-25432 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Members 信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8f2adc6c247725bf2eb7f53256c93ea7 | CVE-2021-25433 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Tizen安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| 8f949676124339eb6f64f9c607af5470 | CVE-2021-25431 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Mobile Device Cameralyzer 访问控制错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 069818a8958f9c158fcb0956ee32fc03 | CVE-2021-25434 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Tizen 代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 55b9126220b9722ff5d730d3996877e9 | CVE-2021-32949 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | MDT AutoSave 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| ebab009fffdee3d360dcdff74b0ed061 | CVE-2021-25435 | 2021-07-09 13:28:16 | Samsung Tizen代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 斗象 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 096b6298d82574500dc1a14c9dba4065 | CVE-2022-22038, CVE-2022-22047, CVE-2022-30216, CVE-2022-22029 | 2022-07-15 00:38:28 | 微软2022年7月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 6018f718b2d751478bf1ce069ac65f0d | CVE-2022-2185 | 2022-07-01 09:02:05 | GitLab 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-2185) | 详情 |
| 844719cf0bb4843aff73d2f33cc6dd0b | CVE-2022-30190, CVE-2022-30136 | 2022-06-15 05:48:12 | 微软2022年6月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 8b47000e1abfbacdadb7df6f09152d89 | CVE-2022-26134 | 2022-06-03 05:48:38 | Atlassian Confluence 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-26134) | 详情 |
| eebe93468b36d2ca24cf4b82136a5635 | CVE-2022-30190 | 2022-05-31 13:57:17 | Microsoft Windows MSDT 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-30190) | 详情 |
| 95525e3f5907a776dc7cd4f87f2e2154 | 2022-05-23 07:11:04 | Fastjson 反序列化漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 945fd6e612634d9721f861833f1ecb75 | CVE-2022-26925, CVE-2022-26937, CVE-2022-22017, CVE-2022-26923 | 2022-05-11 03:45:48 | 微软2022年5月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| e2938ff82d0cc152508e0240697def4c | CVE-2022-1388 | 2022-05-06 05:53:04 | F5 BIG-IP iControl REST 身份验证绕过漏洞(CVE-2022-1388) | 详情 |
| bcf7253d2ee580c618737de137d370c4 | CVE-2022-29464 | 2022-04-22 02:21:17 | WSO2 Carbon Server 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-29464) | 详情 |
| 07c09799b08afb04c63a9de750b70aca | CVE-2022-26809, CVE-2022-24491, CVE-2022-24497, CVE-2022-26815, CVE-2022-26904 | 2022-04-13 07:51:00 | 微软2022年4月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f5b543501ed5679d423411edac502e24 | CVE-2022-22954, CVE-2022-22955, CVE-2022-22956, CVE-2022-22957, CVE-2022-22958, CVE-2022-22959, CVE-2022-22960, CVE-2022-22961 | 2022-04-08 03:49:31 | VMware 产品多个高危漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| f421bcdb306e2bc1ffbf58fcb024a0dd | 2022-03-29 17:11:30 | Spring 框架远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 0473358d95e58c7c3f2e7db0109f56f4 | 2022-03-29 17:11:30 | Spring Framework 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-22965) | 详情 | |
| a888c948ca1172f8a06a3879479f1de4 | CVE-2022-22965 | 2022-03-29 17:11:30 | Spring Framework 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-22965) | 详情 |
| 71ed541bb737196268b75c7ba435e1a9 | 2022-03-28 04:57:30 | Spring Cloud Function SpEL表达式注入漏洞 | 详情 | |
| f7a5dcd376be777c6593a29b8ebd411a | CVE-2022-0778 | 2022-03-18 07:09:22 | OpenSSL拒绝服务漏洞(CVE-2022-0778) | 详情 |
| 6c4124fed44906a79843cd2dd383c695 | CVE-2022-0847 | 2022-03-15 03:32:03 | Linux Kernel本地提权漏洞(CVE-2022-0847) | 详情 |
| a2795e4829bff16f108cf191eba663c3 | CVE-2022-21990, CVE-2022-24508, CVE-2022-23277 | 2022-03-11 02:14:56 | 微软2022年3月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| d09f0641bf65c64a16d802cd78e14097 | CVE-2022-0847 | 2022-03-08 08:23:08 | Linux 内核本地提权漏洞(CVE-2022-0847) | 详情 |
| 69052e2a8c09416f5df674f92cba25a6 | CVE-2022-22947 | 2022-03-02 11:42:55 | Spring Cloud Gateway 远程代码执行漏洞(CVE-2022-22947) | 详情 |
| 5f42b6f584a9ace426787dc8dfd6e6e5 | 2022-02-16 10:44:18 | 向日葵远程命令执行漏洞(CNVD-2022-10270) | 详情 | |
| 79556071f6236ab4674f75b3beee4d79 | CVE-2022-24112 | 2022-02-11 06:13:35 | Apache APISIX 远程代码执行漏洞 (CVE-2022-24112) | 详情 |
| 485f2c57713f4a39830e8c2d01e43cfe | CVE-2021-4034 | 2022-01-26 06:19:16 | Linux Polkit 权限提升漏洞(CVE-2021-4034) | 详情 |
| 0aa6eab412c0318b74c6a470ee774df1 | CVE-2022-21907, CVE-2022-21969, CVE-2022-21846, CVE-2022-21855, CVE-2022-21874, CVE-2022-21893, CVE-2022-21850, CVE-2022-21851, CVE-2022-21836, CVE-2022-21919 | 2022-01-12 03:44:50 | 微软2022年1月补丁日漏洞通告 | 详情 |
| 88a8c676b52a739c0335d7c21ca810a9 | 2022-01-06 08:19:17 | MeterSphere 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 76cad61d2d5a8750a6a714ab2c6dbc97 | CVE-2021-45232 | 2021-12-28 10:31:16 | Apache APISIX Dashboard 接口未授权访问漏洞(CVE-2021-45232) | 详情 |
| af4f5f63390eb00de8705b5029d8c376 | CVE-2021-44228, CVE-2021-45046 | 2021-12-14 01:56:52 | Apache Log4j 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 43456ae172e45c12087c40c03d925e0e | CVE-2021-44228 | 2021-12-11 03:21:34 | Apache Log4j 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 |
| 392b133d98d6f61aee36ce6c8784f4df | 2021-12-09 15:20:54 | Apache Log4j 远程代码执行漏洞 | 详情 | |
| 1e193280a8f45427c06cb4945be4f126 | 2021-12-07 06:48:55 | Grafana 任意文件读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 红后 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6fa0a347889bf0da0cae47ef068a6a99 | CVE-2023-32836 | 2023-11-16 21:05:37 | GOOGLE ANDROID Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 49751f9f84ed69956c96cc87959ec666 | CVE-2021-22499 | 2023-11-16 21:05:34 | Micro Focus Application Performance Management 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| eaa040f80d817832a627456843d3e24c | CVE-2021-23883 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | 迈克菲 McAfee Endpoint Security 代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| d52ddce51389f668d6fad6e7044bd974 | CVE-2021-23878 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | 迈克菲 McAfee Endpoint Security 加密问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| b62432054e9970a34c4d9e4d9efd1075 | CVE-2023-32838 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | GOOGLE ANDROID Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 162855c32b8e1a1dafd6ef3e7a3b3da8 | CVE-2022-43554 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | IVANTI AVALANCHE Vulnerability | 详情 |
| dff8e982c8571446fc1d46fdb5263781 | CVE-2021-21019 | 2023-11-16 21:05:33 | Adobe Magento 注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5c28bf13629d4240819bb4f492d588a9 | CVE-2022-34396 | 2023-11-15 21:56:12 | DELL OPENMANAGE_SERVER_ADMINISTRATOR Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 8876fd1be50182e42f17aaf033bfaf25 | CVE-2022-45098 | 2023-11-15 21:56:10 | DELL EMC_POWERSCALE_ONEFS Vulnerability | 详情 |
| d8a4cb7ca4e0f29533302f9f97f22a55 | CVE-2022-45102 | 2023-11-15 21:55:56 | DELL Multiple product Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 72e081fb5149198ecc92f3f06383f0d5 | CVE-2023-0512 | 2023-11-15 21:55:53 | VIM VIM Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 741e4f08caf4baef7072136884f07ae6 | CVE-2023-24829 | 2023-11-15 21:55:48 | APACHE IOTDB Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 06eca26d44409544e5ec96702bf85ce0 | CVE-2023-23628 | 2023-11-15 21:54:44 | METABASE METABASE Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 830da4b9e4f027d37c9e39125a30cc18 | CVE-2022-3488 | 2023-11-15 21:54:27 | ISC BIND Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 93ceb6d645101eee2b05535717260299 | CVE-2022-45808 | 2023-11-15 21:54:21 | THIMPRESS LEARNPRESS Vulnerability | 详情 |
| d79756a4e0c6522a5ba958c82d0b4c88 | CVE-2023-22482 | 2023-11-15 21:54:17 | LINUXFOUNDATION ARGO-CD Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 1c317622086c85695ff9266e3c5cf66f | CVE-2022-4323 | 2023-11-15 21:54:16 | SUMO GOOGLE_ANALYTICATOR Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 6e8e12e7cd90fd6550e5cef8c12a4a50 | CVE-2023-24069 | 2023-11-15 21:54:13 | SIGNAL SIGNAL-DESKTOP Vulnerability | 详情 |
| de78bbaf8c5f6d744b657b8b7733d20e | CVE-2023-24044 | 2023-11-15 21:54:12 | PLESK OBSIDIAN Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 44e1e95916d186bbbc5cabca01532712 | CVE-2022-41733 | 2023-11-15 21:54:05 | IBM INFOSPHERE_INFORMATION_SERVER Vulnerability | 详情 |
| 136d79ca309f157fcf93764b6993609c | CVE-2022-20752 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | Cisco Unified Communications Manager 和 Cisco Unity Connection安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| cfa598cc25996bf7c25d8622f86868f3 | CVE-2022-32208 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | curl 缓冲区错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 5dc2248c28a031fb6cb3e94f714da748 | CVE-2021-31677 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | PESCMS 跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2df25199d06527c66c1929ede927aa18 | CVE-2022-20800 | 2023-11-15 20:59:35 | Cisco Unified Communications Manager 跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 537152d5106a70b12b4e0204db3ba5b3 | CVE-2022-2304 | 2023-11-15 20:59:34 | Vim 安全漏洞 | 详情 |
| dee30b1a759cdba8cda08222c3b6cf63 | CVE-2022-2309 | 2023-11-15 20:59:34 | lxml 和 libxml2 代码问题漏洞 | 详情 |
| edc189cc3f6caea2e67f158e0f93dd19 | CVE-2022-31116 | 2023-11-15 20:59:34 | UltraJSON 其他漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3e53baf169ff30745b9dfa6f9505233b | CVE-2022-20791 | 2023-11-15 20:59:26 | Cisco Unified Communications Manager 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6ae237378a32e08e6f0495fa3dbce32b | CVE-2022-20812 | 2023-11-15 20:59:26 | Cisco Expressway Series 和 Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server 路径遍历漏洞 | 详情 |
| a2523ef82d3016d54faf64dd9af12f3f | CVE-2022-31129 | 2023-11-15 20:59:26 | Moment.js 资源管理错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 绿盟 [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07ff13766e6eda544e413ceb300607e9 | CVE-2024-12312 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Print Science Designer plugin不受信任数据反序列化漏洞 | 详情 |
| 96e0b0c91b06d953b4a5ecfec71bc612 | CVE-2024-12329 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Essential Real Estate plugin敏感信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 205143180fd646aa434da08572dc37a5 | CVE-2024-12564 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | Open Design Alliance CDE inWEB SDK敏感信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 78c4aba7419004dcc8345585d527ae37 | CVE-2024-12333 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Woodmart theme代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2d3fe5437226d262f5c3df68dba66d7c | CVE-2024-11760 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Currency Converter Widget PRO plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 319c981098d0f2d7bc91e06390e4800c | CVE-2024-12160 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Seraphinite Bulk Discounts for WooCommerce跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 9c491939e6e0bd7c2901366e18b6d07c | CVE-2024-10043 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | GitLab EE授权错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| b01d6119078e51c36fd74abe01052e61 | CVE-2024-12201 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Hash Form plugin授权缺失漏洞 | 详情 |
| 1589394801933a9f20626d1ddb8fceee | CVE-2024-12397 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | Quarkus HTTP请求夹带漏洞 | 详情 |
| d03ae50732ec3864b9ee63b6ca0d6819 | CVE-2024-11727 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress NotificationX plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 2a7dc7fdb9b96a3347032f71650e65e0 | CVE-2024-12401 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | cert-manager输入验证错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| 96ac6565cb6d60af90a82f5ca6441700 | CVE-2024-11724 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Cookie Consent for WP plugin授权缺失漏洞 | 详情 |
| ef7b44b2166f0d595eba2dc2089677ea | CVE-2024-21574 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | ComfyUI-Manager代码注入漏洞 | 详情 |
| a3bd04b9029a521aaf5f3ffe4484cd2d | CVE-2024-11181 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Greenshift plugin信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 09791539b80d43a3e70c0c615a371846 | CVE-2024-12265 | 2025-02-28 13:27:57 | WordPress Web3 Crypto Payments by DePay for WooCommerce授权缺失漏洞 | 详情 |
| f1ebe5e8c4d2b27532decaae22b958c3 | CVE-2024-46622 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | SecureAge Security Suite权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| 11c80e9d55ccd43a588f386f66557910 | CVE-2025-22395 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Dell Update Package Framework权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| 978a3b64cac54d324490e1d9ccb9d973 | CVE-2024-48455 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Netis Systems多款产品信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| 937d32d09ab3d79285bd35cefe2e4fc8 | CVE-2024-54880 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | SeaCMS访问控制错误漏洞 | 详情 |
| b142cb6a61cb3f3bca079b01c03d1daa | CVE-2024-56828 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | ChestnutCMS文件上传漏洞 | 详情 |
| 565566dae4c14015c56f1686d51158d9 | CVE-2024-48457 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Netis Systems多款产品越界读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 88439523bbc7fbb5316a3d53d7ef8045 | CVE-2024-48456 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Netis Systems多款产品越界读取漏洞 | 详情 |
| 48d06e40461ebe2a07d633bbaac7f98b | CVE-2024-12402 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Themes Coder Plugin权限提升漏洞 | 详情 |
| 091cbc8c2acc33047566c6ba72c0a5f2 | CVE-2024-11777 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Sell Media Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 992986b17991ac85700a5c82085792fe | CVE-2024-55074 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | Grocy跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6dde449c96bd83c445bd0f39adf55b81 | CVE-2024-11290 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Member Access Plugin信息泄露漏洞 | 详情 |
| b44a11235219206cb5e4232040129753 | CVE-2024-12098 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress ARS Affiliate Page Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 6c2b3d895b8b3067dd3c52f6ee79ce05 | CVE-2024-11337 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Horoscope And Tarot Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 3f7a46526136bcfc4aa36cc908a1439c | CVE-2024-12541 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Chative Live chat and Chatbot Plugin跨站请求伪造漏洞 | 详情 |
| 7ba57109b7dd16786a8483309a85c322 | CVE-2024-11899 | 2025-02-26 09:29:43 | WordPress Slider Pro Lite Plugin跨站脚本漏洞 | 详情 |
| 美国国家漏洞数据库(NVD) [TOP 30] | CVES | TIME | TITLE | URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| c6b3897e8411249dddc03a2582c3afdc | CVE-2023-45955 | 2023-10-31 18:15:08 | An issue discovered in Nanoleaf Light strip v3.5.10 allows attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted write binding attribute commands. | 详情 |
| 752c86d745d9d6748f49970fc6c72bf7 | CVE-2022-48189 | 2023-10-30 15:15:39 | An SMM driver input validation vulnerability in the BIOS of some ThinkPad models could allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | 详情 |
| 8e0bb5e55759a9b19da4ce8a5bf48799 | CVE-2022-4573 | 2023-10-30 15:15:39 | An SMI handler input validation vulnerability in the ThinkPad X1 Fold Gen 1 could allow an attacker with local access and elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. | 详情 |
| 790b026d2f9b8a38a121baf7cc9fbbe2 | CVE-2023-45797 | 2023-10-30 07:15:12 | A Buffer overflow vulnerability in DreamSecurity MagicLine4NX versions 1.0.0.1 to 1.0.0.26 allows an attacker to remotely execute code. | 详情 |
| 9fee627171b8e0c7c2f065dae65c293c | CVE-2023-46468 | 2023-10-28 01:15:51 | An issue in juzawebCMS v.3.4 and before allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted file to the custom plugin function. | 详情 |
| 1f2c404d06acfac83f7761c8ab878dee | CVE-2023-43322 | 2023-10-28 01:15:51 | ZPE Systems, Inc Nodegrid OS v5.0.0 to v5.0.17, v5.2.0 to v5.2.19, v5.4.0 to v5.4.16, v5.6.0 to v5.6.13, v5.8.0 to v5.8.10, and v5.10.0 to v5.10.3 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via the endpoint /v1/system/toolkit/files/. | 详情 |
| eea9f6fc871d45cb3672714124c1d416 | CVE-2023-46211 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Auth. (contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Brainstorm Force Ultimate Addons for WPBakery Page Builder plugin <=Â 3.19.14 versions. | 详情 |
| 8496e7ff58df6fda25c681900fb6dfb8 | CVE-2023-46209 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in G5Theme Grid Plus – Unlimited grid plugin <= 1.3.2 versions. | 详情 |
| 751468e26927001b02f1b97a3d980488 | CVE-2023-46208 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in StylemixThemes Motors – Car Dealer, Classifieds & Listing plugin <= 1.4.6 versions. | 详情 |
| 26e1875553f4c463d954949d41128765 | CVE-2023-46200 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Stephen Darlington, Wandle Software Limited Smart App Banner plugin <=Â 1.1.3 versions. | 详情 |
| a86c2cbf359259b1e38cd6e0c560a363 | CVE-2023-46509 | 2023-10-27 21:15:09 | An issue in Contec SolarView Compact v.6.0 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the texteditor.php component. | 详情 |
| c608240b549dc25f03e04b5397e48e1b | CVE-2023-46199 | 2023-10-27 08:15:31 | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Triberr plugin <=Â 4.1.1 versions. | 详情 |
| c4bd3098463c3624a284c838fd6ecb48 | CVE-2023-46194 | 2023-10-27 08:15:31 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Eric Teubert Archivist – Custom Archive Templates plugin <= 1.7.5 versions. | 详情 |
| e79edbb292a519fa08055a884d86921e | CVE-2023-46192 | 2023-10-27 08:15:31 | Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Internet Marketing Ninjas Internal Link Building plugin <=Â 1.2.3 versions. | 详情 |
| 528422b82114eedfc8a332c895b5d475 | CVE-2023-46504 | 2023-10-27 04:15:10 | Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PwnCYN YXBOOKCMS v.1.0.2 allows a physically proximate attacker to execute arbitrary code via the library name function in the general settings component. | 详情 |
| 4b4a8cd15c35de7b7cb3e0f5110f178b | CVE-2023-46503 | 2023-10-27 04:15:10 | Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in PwnCYN YXBOOKCMS v.1.0.2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the reader management and book input modules. | 详情 |
| 9637804577e375e89e0c34d1e9dc7daa | CVE-2023-46505 | 2023-10-27 01:15:32 | Cross Site Scripting vulnerability in FanCMS v.1.0.0 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the content1 parameter in the demo.php file. | 详情 |
| ccc0d1dc9e1e6371fc7ed4a7e6bc67c9 | CVE-2023-46491 | 2023-10-27 00:15:09 | ZenTao Biz version 4.1.3 and before has a Cross Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Version Library. | 详情 |
| 925767e89590e6107a882a20468a3153 | CVE-2023-42188 | 2023-10-27 00:15:09 | IceCMS v2.0.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | 详情 |
| 8affd999965e83dbd42583837011424c | CVE-2023-42406 | 2023-10-26 22:15:08 | SQL injection vulnerability in D-Link Online behavior audit gateway DAR-7000 V31R02B1413C allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via the editrole.php component. | 详情 |
| 7d0ccfb0da7a7225f1fd25c20c95a57e | CVE-2023-46435 | 2023-10-26 18:15:08 | Sourcecodester Packers and Movers Management System v1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection via mpms/?p=services/view_service&id. | 详情 |
| 0ab665a469513a0f70af2e1f17519e41 | CVE-2023-5792 | 2023-10-26 17:15:10 | A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Sticky Notes App 1.0 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file endpoint/delete-note.php. The manipulation of the argument note leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-243598 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. | 详情 |
| 692b9ba4d9cf7c90b6a3e5b8396a5302 | CVE-2023-5791 | 2023-10-26 17:15:10 | A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in SourceCodester Sticky Notes App 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file endpoint/add-note.php. The manipulation of the argument noteTitle/noteContent leads to cross site scripting. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier VDB-243597 was assigned to this vulnerability. | 详情 |
| 7e262fff58c0ebc8ddc6cdfb7535d7e2 | CVE-2023-5790 | 2023-10-26 17:15:10 | A vulnerability classified as critical was found in SourceCodester File Manager App 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file endpoint/add-file.php. The manipulation of the argument uploadedFileName leads to unrestricted upload. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-243595. | 详情 |
| c643f1003e7a0ee28d9e54cda26d6b85 | CVE-2023-43208 | 2023-10-26 17:15:09 | NextGen Healthcare Mirth Connect before version 4.4.1 is vulnerable to unauthenticated remote code execution. Note that this vulnerability is caused by the incomplete patch of CVE-2023-37679. | 详情 |
| 3d3bc04cd7ec7fdf5aaaa0aa0a140b90 | CVE-2023-46450 | 2023-10-26 15:15:09 | Sourcecodester Free and Open Source inventory management system 1.0 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via the Add supplier function. | 详情 |
| 844b1b549a5543c879cdc68d7237f444 | CVE-2023-46449 | 2023-10-26 15:15:09 | Sourcecodester Free and Open Source inventory management system v1.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. An arbitrary user can change the password of another user and takeover the account via IDOR in the password change function. | 详情 |
| f494a8af43bc7ce0e5b6f1d2f18f3740 | CVE-2023-46081 | 2023-10-26 13:15:09 | Unauth. Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lavacode Lava Directory Manager plugin <=Â 1.1.34 versions. | 详情 |
| 3a451401fdd162ad57ab72c2f5d7b984 | CVE-2023-46077 | 2023-10-26 13:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Arrow Plugins The Awesome Feed – Custom Feed plugin <= 2.2.5 versions. | 详情 |
| 428d0a0df20b616e36d68a5b76023a38 | CVE-2023-46076 | 2023-10-26 13:15:09 | Unauth. Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in RedNao WooCommerce PDF Invoice Builder, Create invoices, packing slips and more plugin <=Â 1.2.102 versions. | 详情 |